We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders' Questions

Cable O'Leary's planning decision

Summary

Deputy Michael Healy-Rae raises a local Kerry planning case involving a proposed hotel development at Cable O'Leary's, with several lighter interjections around the issue. The Tánaiste declines to comment on An Bord Pleanála decisions in the House and says any challenge must go through the courts.

First, I want to register what could be perceived as a conflict of interest, as always, in matters such as this. I wish to highlight a local and national issue. A very respectable family left Ballinskelligs in south Kerry, went to America and worked very hard, became successful employers who created valued and great employment for people who left our shores and went to America. That family wanted to do something good for Kerry and their country. They owned a small place called Cable O'Leary's, a lovely public house and restaurant. They wanted to demolish it and build a modest, 45-bedroom hotel in its place. It was a well thought out hotel in a nice location. Kerry County Council, which I could not support more, and our excellent planners looked at what was proposed in the plans and, in their wisdom, said yes. This was good for the area of south Kerry, for Kerry and for Ireland. This family was not going to be borrowing money. They did not want anything from Government; they wanted nothing from no one. All they wanted was the right to build and develop a good quality hotel where people from the locality and around the country could go to have weddings, funeral parties, christenings and a great focal point in Ballinskelligs. They got their planning permission and, lo and behold, there was an objection. That objection went to An Bord Pleanála. For the sake of €200 - a miserable, rotten price - the objectors were able to take this respectable family to An Bord Pleanála which, in its infinite wisdom, took away the planning permission that was thoughtfully granted by Kerry County Council. It has robbed the community of employment, a focal point and a place for people to go to. This has happened many times throughout the country.

Apple did not invest €850 million in Athenry. Everything was going smoothly for that investment of almost €1 billion. What happened? Apple was hunted out of Athenry, Galway and Ireland because of objectors. The Tánaiste will know these things in his heart and soul. It is good to be asking questions of a person of substance and ability who can answer. He knows my feelings on that. I am glad to see the Tánaiste sitting there and the longer he sits there the better it might be. In the name of God, what action is going to be taken to deal with the planning process? How are we going to root out these serial objectors, these do-gooders who are good for nothing? These people never did anything or created anything in their lives, only wrote a stupid piece of paper and gave €20 to a local authority or €200 to An Bord Pleanála. There are people in An Bord Pleanála who will go against everything - Government policy, local authority policy, elected Members and members of our county councils who are democratically elected. These people will throw all that out the window and rob us.

Comment on this
Simon Coveney The Tánaiste Fine Gael

I thank the Deputy for the compliment.

Comment on this

Flattery gets one everywhere.

Comment on this
Simon Coveney The Tánaiste Fine Gael

I sense a honeytrap there.

Comment on this

We will spare the Tánaiste that.

Comment on this
Simon Coveney The Tánaiste Fine Gael

Please do. It would be inappropriate for me to comment on any decision of An Bord Pleanála in this House. It is an independent agency which makes decisions every day that we need to respect.

Comment on this

It is a matter for the High Court.

Comment on this
Simon Coveney The Tánaiste Fine Gael

The only mechanism that can question those decisions is the court system if someone chooses to test such a decision through judicial review of the process by which a decision is made as opposed to the actual planning decision itself.

One of the issues that arose during the work on the Project Ireland 2040 plan, which I was very involved in, arose from the learnings from the Athenry data centre case to which the Deputy referred. There is a need to make sure that our planning laws are as robust and speedy as possible in order to ensure that our infrastructure investment programme, as well as that of the private sector, can be delivered as efficiently as possible and does not suffer undue or unreasonable delay. In that context, the Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government established a working group last year to examine the scope for improvements in, and the streamlining of, the planning legislation so that important projects can progress more speedily through the process. Further to the working group's deliberations, the Minister, Deputy Eoghan Murphy, intends to submit proposals for a new planning and development amendment Bill in the next month or so, focusing particularly on the reform of the judicial review process I referred to in respect of planning cases and further streamlining the strategic infrastructure development provisions so that decisions can be made in a more timely manner.

The 2040 plan envisages that half of Ireland's population growth in the next two decades will happen across rural towns and villages, and indeed rural Ireland outside of Dublin. If we are going to facilitate that kind of population growth, and we are anticipating that Ireland's population will grow by over 1 million people in that period, we need to ensure we have a planning system that is fit for purpose. Our planning system is a good one but there are things about it that could be improved. The Deputy will have an opportunity, during the passing of the legislation in this House, to put his perspective on that debate.

Comment on this