In camera rule in family law
Deputy Bernard J. Durkan again questioned the use of an alleged condition in family law cases and suggested abolishing or changing the in camera rule. The Taoiseach said the rule exists to protect children and families and would need very careful consideration before any waiver.
Once again, I raise the question of the use of a particular alleged condition in family law cases. This situation continues without interruption or indication of an interruption other than what the Minister has already said which, I hope, will put an end to the practice. To ensure there is absolute certainty about that, either the in camera rule has to be abolished or there has to be a serious deviation from the present practice.
Comment on this
I appreciate the Deputy's interest in this matter and his consistency in raising it in the House. The in camera rule is there generally speaking to protect the identity of children and families in what can be very sensitive cases. To waive that would be something we would have to think about very carefully.