We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil

Gnó na Dála - Business of Dáil

I understand that the Government Chief Whip has a business proposal to put to us.

Comment on this
Hildegarde Naughton Minister of State at the Department of the Taoiseach Fine Gael

Given the interest expressed in the debate on the motion on international protection, asylum and migration, I propose to extend it into next week and proceed with the three Bills that are scheduled this evening. The proposal is as follows: "That, in relation to the arrangements for the motion re proposed approval by Dáil Éireann of the Regulations and a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on international protection, asylum and migration, the arrangements shall be modified to the extent that Deputy Marc MacSharry may make a speech not exceeding five minutes and the proceedings on the motion and any amendment thereto shall be adjourned immediately, prior to the Minister's concluding response".

Comment on this

It is proposed that we will continue next week. Is that agreed?

Comment on this

It is questionable-----

Comment on this

The Deputy is getting more time.

Comment on this

Yes, I am. This is the trick. It is a trick of the loop because I honestly believe the Government might be short of numbers tonight and it is afraid to hold a vote. There was no consultation with the Whips - not with me anyway.

Comment on this

People wanted more time and they are getting more time.

Comment on this

Of course I want more time because it is a very serious issue. I want a referendum but it is being played around with. It was buried for three weeks during the elections to get the next one over and fool the people and now the Government is trying to fool all of us here too.

Comment on this

Is it agreed that we will defer?

Comment on this

Who are the Members who have yet to speak? We were advised that anybody who wished to speak would be present here in the Chamber. That was a message sent through all the Whips earlier on. Who are the people who have indicated to speak?

Comment on this

Deputy MacSharry is here.

Comment on this

Yes, he is here-----

Comment on this

There may be others who are waiting for Deputy MacSharry to-----

Comment on this

Who are these Members who have indicated?

Comment on this

I do not know. I am not a clairvoyant.

Comment on this

Okay. We do not agree to it then.

Comment on this

The Members are not agreeing to giving Deputy MacSharry some time.

Comment on this

To be clear, there is to be a vote tonight on this matter. It was agreed by the Taoiseach that more time would be provided if Members presented themselves to be here to speak. Right now, Deputy MacSharry is here to speak. I want to know who the other Members who have indicated they want to speak are, because we are supposed to have a vote on this tonight.

Comment on this

I take it that the Chief Whip has knowledge of others who wish to contribute.

Comment on this

There are others who have indicated and expressed interest in speaking in this debate, which is why I want to schedule it again next week-----

Comment on this

Because they cannot be here-----

Comment on this

-----to give people ample time to discuss it.

Comment on this

That is not agreed.

Comment on this

On a point of order-----

Comment on this

The proposal is not agreed.

Comment on this

Are we going to call a vote on whether we have more time to-----

Comment on this

Because the Government is playing games, yes.

Comment on this

Deputies, let us think about this. The public is looking in. We have been asking for weeks, quite rightly in my view, for more time to discuss this. The Chief Whip has come in to say that the Government is going to give us more time and now the Members are going to say they do not want more time.

Comment on this

To be clear, what was agreed was that more time would be provided if Members showed up here. Right now, another hour would suffice to deal with the matter. A vote is scheduled for tonight and a vote should take place.

Comment on this

I am certainly not agreeing to sitting here for another hour. That will mean we will be here until 1 a.m. The Deputy might like to be here but I am not going to ask the staff to be here until those unearthly hours.

It is not agreed. Are we going to have a vote?

Comment on this

I have been here all evening and have annoyed the clerks by asking how many more speakers there are. Why are they not on the list? We are always told our names have to be on the list to speak. It looks like a charade, walks like a charade and is a charade. Nothing short of it.

Comment on this

People come up to me constantly and ask me if they can get in. I do everything I can to facilitate that.

Comment on this

For the benefit of people watching in, what is due to happen, without any change, is that everyone who has indicated and is present will have spoken within the allocated time, a vote would have proceeded and everyone who had sought time would have had the opportunity to speak. I am quite relaxed about this. I believe what might be expected has been discussed outside of the Chamber to some extent. It seems to me that what is being presented is an opportunity for the Minister to demonstrate generosity in order to come back next week and have a two-minute debate. We will not be here until 1 a.m. because after the Minister and Deputy MacSharry speak, if a single other name could be provided I would be very surprised. I am quite relaxed about this. Some people call it virtue signalling. To me, it is a gesture. If the Whip has additional names, I am sure we can hear them. I am not terribly bothered by this. It seems to be quite silly of the Government to be behaving in this kind of way.

Comment on this

It would be without precedent. I have never heard of a situation in which Members came in and made a decision but wanted to know the names of the people who potentially wanted to speak if the time was allocated. That has never happened and it is not going to happen now.

Comment on this

I think I am making a valid point of order; the Ceann Comhairle can tell me whether he will allow it. What is going on here this evening with the deferral of the vote - this is the place where we hear all of the stories - is that the Government is not happy that it has enough numbers this evening and wants to have a better vote next week. Can the Whip confirm, through the Chair, whether that is the problem and why the vote is not being called? That is what is being said.

Comment on this

I am not going to allow the Whip to respond to that because that is not a question that bears answering. The reality is that we are scheduled to go on after this to votable business. I presume everybody who should have people here to vote are going to be here to vote. Are you calling a vote on this?

Comment on this
Bernard Durkan Deputy Bernard J. Durkan Fine Gael

Before you proceed, I have indicated a wish to speak on this important subject. Several other of my colleagues have not spoken and could not be here on time, but will be here to speak on the subject. I welcome the proposal put forward by the Government Whip.

Comment on this

This is what I alluded to in my speech a few minutes ago. I am a bit like Deputy Ó Laoghaire; I am indifferent and neutral on this. If the Chief Whip says there should be more time afforded to the debate, I am all for that. At committee, we afforded more time. The time petered out and Deputies did not offer to contribute, so naturally the debate ran to a close. I want to be clear on what we are voting on. As I understand it, we are voting for more time to be allowed for the debate and the Members opposite are opposing that proposal. They do not want more time afforded to the debate.

Comment on this

They seem to be projecting their own conspiracies onto that and saying there is some ulterior motive. That is not appropriate.

Comment on this

I appreciate that the Government was prepared to allow me to speak. I very much appreciate that. In fairness to everybody here - a lot of us have been around these Houses for a long time - it is clear what is happening. It is tactical. Numbers are tight. Let us get on and have a vote. If there was interest in giving me time, I would have preferred for that to have been decoupled from pushing the motion on until there were more generous Government Members available.

Comment on this
Bernard Durkan Deputy Bernard J. Durkan Fine Gael

I do not wish to prolong this debate. If a Member or Members wish to speak, they are entitled to speak and have their wishes adhered to. There is no game in this House like the old political game of trying to seize an opportunity when somebody seizes an opportunity. That is not what this House is about. This is about democracy. This is a very serious subject that needs full and adequate discussion and debate in the House. My feeling is that sufficient time was not allowed in the first place and I welcome the extra time now proposed by the Chief Whip.

Comment on this

I have assured Deputy MacSharry, who had indicated to me that he wanted to speak, that time would be made available to him. You are now indicating, Deputy, that you want time. It is 7.55 p.m. and we must conclude at 8 p.m. The Minister is required to respond. Her response stretches to ten minutes. It is physically impossible to conclude the business within the timescale set out. The Chief Whip's proposal is to defer further debate until next week. I am certainly not content to continue this to a point that people are required to be here. According to the schedule, our finishing time is 12 midnight. I am not prepared to stand over a situation in which, conscious of the fact that if we go on with this debate until 12 midnight or 12.30 a.m, staff who work here will be here for an additional hour afterwards. We are not right in putting that burden on people who have planned their week and working day.

Comment on this

The discussion of the legislation that would follows the conclusion of this motion is not anticipated to last for the time for which it is scheduled. I propose an amendment to the Government proposal that we make one more hour available for those who wish to avail of this. That is my amendment and if that is not agreed, unfortunately we cannot agree to the motion.

Comment on this

Our group is concerned about the late hours for the staff. It is crazy and ridiculous to have that both nights this week. This is a distasteful game. It was hidden during the election three weeks ago. We saw the rush when the motion was proposed in late April to get it done by 9 May. That backfired and when people were getting it in the neck on the doors the motion was postponed. Disgracefully, the Government hid and buried it, and brought it back tonight. This is a further extension of that game and the deceit goes on. I support the proposal from Deputy Mac Lochlainn.

Comment on this

It would be my view that Deputy Mac Lochlainn's proposal is in direct contradiction to what has been proposed. They are negatived. I would assume that we then have a vote on the Chief Whip's recommendation.

Comment on this
Division Carried

Question put: "That the business proposal be agreed to."

Tá 74
·
Níl 68

Do you agree with this result?

The question is carried. That means Deputy MacSharry gets his five minutes.

Comment on this

And a full house.

Comment on this

Yes.

Comment on this
A Deputy

Soon to be empty.

Comment on this