276. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Social Protection the estimated amount of PRSI lost to the State by employers insisting that workers who were previously employees are now classified as self-employed; the impact same can have on the payment of future pension contributions; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [37647/24]

277. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of inspections on an annual basis that are taken to ensure that employers of workers who are identified as self-employed are compliant and their workers are genuinely self-employed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [37648/24]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 276 and 277 together.

The Department of Social Protection is responsible for ensuring the correct class of PRSI is being returned for individuals to protect their PRSI contribution record and future welfare entitlements. The Department must also ensure the correct amount and value of funds is remitted to the Social Insurance Fund. The Deputy should be aware that both employee and self-employed contributors can qualify for the State Pension if they meet the relevant qualifying criteria.

My Department tackles false self-employment on two fronts: a robust inspection regime and the provision of clear guidance and information for employers and workers.

The Department undertakes employer inspections and PRSI compliance checks. Where it is identified that the correct class of PRSI has not been returned the workers record is corrected and employers are required to remit the correct value of contributions back-dated as appropriate.

During 2023, just over 4,500 employer inspections and 16,200 employee PRSI reviews were carried out by Departmental staff across various sectoral employments. Up to end of July 2024, provisional figures show that just over 2,300 employer inspections and 8,300 employee PRSI reviews have been completed.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.