The Taoiseach is hell-bent on upending the democratic functioning of the Dáil to protect his grubby deal with Deputy Michael Lowry. Today the Taoiseach will try to ram through unprecedented changes to Dáil rules to allow Deputy Lowry and his group of TDs to sit in Government and Opposition at the same time. These are TDs who have pledged to support his Government in good days and in bad, to use their own words. It is a farce and it is making a mockery of this Dáil. Frankly, the lengths to which the Taoiseach has gone with this brazen stroke are staggering.

Let us put an end to the charade. The Michael Lowry group are Government TDs, plain and simple. They designated themselves as such when they helped to negotiate, write and agree the programme for Government. Their colleagues were rewarded with ministerial office. That is the reality. On 23 January, the Government gave its word that it would work for a solution acceptable to both Government and Opposition. Hildegarde Naughton, then Chief Whip, pledged in the Dáil to “work to secure agreement, as soon as possible and acceptable to Government and Opposition", but clearly the Taoiseach's word means nothing. He has gone back on his commitment and has made no genuine effort to find a resolution. Instead, he proposes to turn the Dáil inside out by allowing Government TDs access to the mechanisms which the actual Opposition uses to hold his Government to account. He wants the utterly absurd spectacle of Michael Lowry and his group taking Leaders' Questions and pretending to challenge the Government they are part of.

This is a sham. The Taoiseach has dug in because he does not want to be accountable. His claim that this is all about speaking time for backbenchers is patently untrue. In fact, he wants to get rid of Taoiseach’s Questions on a Wednesday. Pull the other one, Taoiseach.

Accountability matters. Just ask those he misled on housing delivery during the election or the parents of children with special needs who the Government led up the garden path on funding of services. The Taoiseach does not want to be accountable. Is that not the truth?

This is stroke politics.

What exactly does Deputy Lowry have over the Taoiseach? What debt does he owe him? The former Fine Gael Minister, a rogue politician as the Taoiseach described him, is now kingmaker for the Government. This is a man the Taoiseach wants to sit in both government and opposition at the same time.

The combined Opposition has repeatedly sought to meet with the Taoiseach to resolve this matter. Our offers have either been rejected or ignored. He acts in bad faith. To meet his narrow short-term need to placate Lowry and Co., he now proposes to do real and lasting damage to the democratic processes of the Dáil.

Tá Fianna Fáil agus Fine Gael ag moladh feidhmiú daonlathach na Dála a iompú bun os cionn chun an socrú suarach atá acu leis an Teachta Lowry a chosaint. Ní ghlacfaidh muid leis. The combined Opposition is not backing down on this matter. We reject the Taoiseach's attempt to run roughshod over this Dáil and to ram through this motion. He can step back from the brink. He can still meet with the Opposition to work out a solution. What he will not get away with, however, is pretending that signed and sealed Government TDs can act as Opposition. You cannot be in government and opposition at the same time.

Ar dtús báire, is mian liom a rá nach n-aontaím in aon chor leis an méid atá ráite ag an Teachta McDonald.

Ní rud nua é sin.

Tá sé dochreidte an méid atá ráite aici. Níl i gceist againn ach ocht nóiméad ar an Mháirt agus ocht nóiméad breise ar an gCéadaoin a thabhairt do chúlbhinseoirí-----

Amaidí.

Minus 45 minutes.

-----an Rialtais agus Teachtaí Dála neamhspleácha. In essence, I have to say that-----

Spoofer.

-----the distortion of the debate is extraordinary. The disproportionate response of Sinn Féin and indeed the Opposition is extraordinary. Considering that this Dáil meets 101 days approximately per year.

Whose fault is that?

What is being proposed for 60 TDs is that they would have an opportunity-----

There is only one who matters.

They have lots of opportunities and the Taoiseach knows it.

-----of eight minutes on a Tuesday and eight minutes on a Wednesday to ask a question of the Taoiseach of the day. That actually means that for an individual in that group of 60, it could be an opportunity-----

They have Taoiseach's Questions.

I have not interrupted anyone. It basically means that once a year-----

Who are you speaking to?

That is not the issue.

-----a backbench TD may get that opportunity to speak in these sorts of questions.

It was not an issue when the Green Party was in government.

For all that, the Opposition has manufactured a political row and has raised this issue to heights that are quite farcical given the enormity of the issues we have to face as a country.

You have done this.

If I may say-----

Do Deputies wish to listen to the answer out of respect for the functions-----

We want an answer.

Again, I respect-----

If the Deputies listen-----

The Taoiseach does not respect this House.

How does Deputy Lowry pull the Taoiseach's strings from that distance?

Answer the question.

Deputies, please. The Taoiseach is speaking. Did Deputies not notice? A question was asked.

But he is not saying anything.

He is. The Deputy might not-----

He is talking to the Gallery.

I respect the rights of every Deputy who is elected to this House. I respect their rights.

Except those of the Opposition.

I respect their rights to be heard-----

Is that when you are in government?

-----as well as their rights to speak.

Then why are you halving our time?

There is an attempt already to frustrate my attempt to speak here this afternoon in response to Deputy McDonald.

The Taoiseach is trying to escape his responsibility. Some 30 hours per year is a Government scapegoat.

In a more serious vein, the Opposition has been endeavouring to, if you like, direct or dictate a new departure, whereby it becomes the Opposition-----

We are trying to stop a new departure.

The Opposition is now saying that it is up to it to decide who sits where in this House, who forms what group-----

No, by agreement.

The Ceann Comhairle has already decided.

That is unprecedented by any yardstick.

That man is pulling your strings. That is what is happening.

I have never, and I am in this House-----

What has he got on you?

Deputies, I am standing. I expect that you will respect the Chair. We are in a democratic House. This is Leaders' Questions.

Deputies, whether you like what is being said or not, please listen. That is the process.

If we got an answer, that would be nice.

We have a lot of visitors in the Gallery. The public are watching. I am asking you all to have respect for one another, one and all. That is all I am asking for on behalf of those who are watching.

They are subverting this Chamber.

I was first elected to this House in 1989. I have never seen an attempt like this to say-----

Now we are getting a history lesson.

I have never seen an attempt like this to tell-----

You are right. We will agree on that one. Never before have we seen a stroke like this.

Deputies, while you may not have respect for me, I am the Chair. When I speak, nobody else speaks.

Respect the Ceann Comhairle's decision.

Deputies, I am asking that you respect the process and the operation of the House.

Just stick to the decision that was made.

That means that when I speak, I ask you to have respect for the Chair. That decision has been made and it is well gone. We are in the democratic process of where we are on a different matter today. I ask Deputy McDonald to respond.

No, it is the same matter.

A Cheann Comhairle, with the greatest of respect, we are on the same ground. Micheál Martin can spare us and the nation his sanctimonious homilies on democracy. He has been here since 1989, which is a political lifetime. Never has such a brazen stroke been attempted. In all of the peculiar shenanigans of this place, there has never been something like this. The Taoiseach was quick enough to throw his own people under the bus in the last Dáil when it suited him. It is incredible that he will go to these extraordinary lengths for Deputy Michael Lowry.

Hear, hear.

We are asking why. We should have an answer to this. It is as simple as this: the Taoiseach should not take people for fools. People know that for their interests to be protected and for politics and democracy to work, the Government has its prerogatives to discharge. We respect that. The Taoiseach needs to respect the duty and the prerogatives of the Opposition but he does not want that. He wants a blunt Opposition because he does not want to be held to account. If he is worried about his backbenchers, he should leave Taoiseach's questions on a Wednesday. That gives them ample opportunity to raise matters with him.

I hope Deputy McDonald notes that she got full respect and opportunity to speak from this side of the House. I was not afforded that respect and courtesy from the other side of the House when I endeavoured to answer a while ago.

You do not answer the question.

Fundamentally-----

An answer would be nice for a change.

The point I was making is that I have never before witnessed political parties trying to tell others what box they are in or what group they belong to.

They chose the box themselves.

On a point of order, a Cheann Comhairle, you made a ruling and the Government is challenging that ruling. Do not blame us, Taoiseach. The Ceann Comhairle made the ruling.

Deputies, resume your seats when the Ceann Comhairle is standing. We have spent hours. I have invested as much as 20 hours over the past months trying to come to a consensus and an agreement.

There is not any-----

Unfortunately, we have reached an impasse.

Because they did not want to reach a consensus.

I expect respect, Deputy, so that I can finish what I am saying.

Let the ruling stand.

Excuse me, Deputy, I am speaking. We have reached an impasse and when we reach an impasse, we then move to the mechanism that moves all those democratically elected from the impasse, which is the voting mechanism. We are now-----

Did the Chief Whip mislead the Dáil when she sided with you, a Cheann Comhairle, with the acceptance of the Opposition? Could the Ceann Comhairle rule on that? Did the Chief Whip deliberately mislead the Dáil-----

The Deputy should resume his seat.

-----when she stood up and made a promise that the Government would bring forward a proposal that would be acceptable to the Opposition?

Hear, hear.

The Deputy should resume his seat.

Perhaps you should make a judgment on that issue, a Cheann Comhairle.

Deputy Doherty should resume his seat. He knows the rulings of the House.

Make a ruling on that issue, a Cheann Comhairle. Did the Chief Whip deliberately mislead this Dáil?

Is it the case that Deputy Doherty does not have respect for me or the Chair? Now it is becoming apparent that-----

I ask Deputy Doherty to respect the Chair. It is not me; I am not concerned. However, I am the Ceann Comhairle and I am sitting in the Chair and I expect a level of respect to come from each and every Member-----

Hear, hear.

-----when I speak. The level of disruption to which we can go today is well documented. We are either going to continue with Leaders' Questions or we can move on. Deputies may not like the answers they are getting but I cannot give instructions on answers.

We are getting no answers.

My function is to chair this Dáil and ensure that the House operates.

And to be fair and impartial as well.

We are moving on with the business. I now move to Deputy Bacik.

Once more, with today's motion, the Taoiseach is dragging us back to this absurd technical groups issue.

Hear, hear.

Bombs are raining down in a genocidal bombardment on children in Gaza. The people of Ukraine are fighting for their country. Democracy is under threat across the globe - in Belarus, Hungary and Turkey. We see grim new milestones for global warming. The housing crisis is deepening here at home. Fears are growing about the impact of Trump's tariffs. These are the pressing issues that deserve all our attention. Instead, the Government insists on continuing to push through this proposed amendment to Standing Orders, which is a desperate distraction.

The Taoiseach seeks to confuse the issue. He talks about speaking rights, but we all know what is at issue here. This is a simple matter. You cannot be in government and in opposition at the same time.

Hear, hear.

It is at precisely this time that we in this House need to stand firm and resolute in our defence of democratic values, and of our constitutional function as Members of Dáil Éireann.

Hear, hear.

Article 28.4.1° of our Constitution provides that: "The Government shall be responsible to Dáil Éireann." That is why our Standing Orders provide for Leaders' Questions. It is the set-piece exchange every week where we in opposition, as Opposition leaders, get to hold the Taoiseach and the Government to account. It matters for our communities that the lines are clear in a democracy and that we can assign responsibility when things go wrong. Since we took our seats in this Dáil, we sought accountability from the Taoiseach on many issues. For example, statements he and his Ministers made during the general election campaign, when they exaggerated how many houses would be built. We must hold the Government to account on those claims, and on so much more, on behalf of the people we represent.

There are massive delays in children seeking assessments of need. There are failures to provide school places for children with additional needs. There is a glaring absence of climate policies. It is our constitutional duty to represent our communities and hold the Government to account. That is why it matters when we see the Government's continued attempts to create a sham Opposition, a contrivance purely to placate the Lowry lobby.

Hear, hear.

To describe Lowry's group as wolves in sheep's clothing would give them too much credit, but they are a very poor tribute act - a poor imitation of those of us who are genuinely in opposition and taking our constitutional duties seriously. The Taoiseach knows, as does everyone, that the manufactured, nonsensical "other Members' questions" device is really being introduced to give the Lowry lads and Deputy Toole special time to tell the Government how well it is doing. The Taoiseach knows it. Everyone in the country knows it. This is the group that has undertaken to support the Government in good times and bad. The Ceann Comhairle has ruled that they are not in opposition. Let us respect her ruling.

Hear, hear.

Let us give up this farce.

I thank the Deputy.

How can the Taoiseach continue to justify this?

You cannot be in government and in opposition at the same time.

Let us see what is being proposed. Private Members' business still lasts for 120 minutes.

Why is it being proposed in the first place?

There is no change to that. Sponsor time is still 40 minutes, no change.

When you are in government, you are in government.

Sinn Féin's time remains exactly as it was in the last Dáil.

That is not the issue.

What is interesting is that each other Opposition grouping gains time in this Dáil under this proposal as compared with the last time out.

You are turning yourself inside out.

Very generous.

I can recall a time, when the Labour Party had a calamitous general election result, that we facilitated reducing the threshold to allow the Labour Party to have speaking rights. That is easily forgotten by the Deputy and her party members. There is no change in Ministers and Ministers of State responding to the Dáil. In other words, there is absolutely no change in terms of accountability of this Government to the Dáil in comparison with the last Dáil.

Bar yourself.

A big change.

Deputies.

What is farcical is the extraordinary manufactured political row, which is wholly disproportionate to this issue-----

Deputies.

In other words, the change is very modest. It does not in any shape or form justify the level of dramatic action and feigned outrage that we are witnessing on the Opposition side.

You are not selling your soul very well in fairness.

I agree with Deputy that there are far more substantive and profound issues------

Then deal with them.

-----facing this country that we should now be getting on with, such as housing and disability services------

This is a political stroke and the Taoiseach knows it.

-----and perhaps what will perhaps be the most significant and profound economic winds blowing in our direction that we have seen for quite some time.

The Government is pulling a stroke.

That is what this Dáil and Oireachtas need to focus on. We also need to focus on the wars that are raging in Europe and the Middle East with appalling and savage loss of life and slaughter of people. Are we seriously suggesting that giving eight minutes per day-----

That is not what it is about.

-----to backbench TDs is such a profound change in the Standing Orders that it necessitates the feigned outrage that we are witnessing-----

Deputies.

I call Deputy Bacik. Does the Taoiseach wish to continue?

I definitely do.

It is not your time yet, Deputy Bacik. The Taoiseach still has a minute left.

I make the point that the level of change here is so minuscule when you look at it.

Stop it.

The 60 TDs will get one chance a year to participate in this forum and that is exciting everyone. There will be one opportunity for a backbench TD to question me, the Taoiseach of the day, and the Opposition is all up to high doh with feigned outrage.

It is an affront to democracy.

I will make one final point. When an election happens, there is a fundamental obligation to form a Government-----

Yes.

-----which has been completely lost of sight of-----

-----and the importance-----

Keep shouting, keep shouting.

Deputies, all you are doing is running down the clock.

The point I was making was that Governments were formed with the support of three Independent TDs, no one at the time------

There are more than three.

They are in government with you.

It is noteworthy that people on the opposite side do not want to hear a response to the questions being asked.

We want answers.

It is a complete shoutdown. They shout down the debate because they do not want to hear explanations.

Thank you, Taoiseach.

No Opposition TD ever lost any rights to this day. This has been proved by multiple senior counsel opinions at this stage under previous Standing Orders.

It is a political issue.

Thank you, Taoiseach. Your is time up. I call Deputy Bacik to respond.