We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna ar Pholasaí nó ar Reachtaíocht - Questions on Policy or Legislation

Senior cycle reform supports

Summary

Deputy Kenny said the Government was using support measures for senior cycle reform as leverage and warned the reform could fail. The Minister replied that the reform has been discussed for years, is not being rushed, and is backed by teachers, unions and students.

The Government is literally using support measures for senior cycle reform as a negotiating tool. These are essential for any reform. There will be a significant impact on students' experiences of senior cycle reform. As someone who has experience in the field, I am of the view that this senior cycle reform is absolutely destined to fail. The package includes fast-tracking permanent contracts for new teachers, more middle management in schools and changes to the hours under the Croke Park agreement.

The Government seems to have a great plan to alleviate teacher shortages and continues to boast about this. Now, however, it is saying that it is not going to do so unless there is compliance with leaving certificate reform. The Government is playing students off the teachers. The measures do not go far enough; they are simply not enough. What is happening now is forcing teachers to support senior cycle reform. A teacher informed me yesterday that instead of addressing the very real concerns many teachers have regarding the pressing issues with rushed reforms, it feels as if they are being bullied to concede. He said that their students deserve better, and so do they. This could possibly be the issue that defines Deputy McEntee's legacy as Minister for Education and Youth. I do not want her to rush it.

Comment on this

Let me assure the Deputy that this is not being rushed. This issue has been discussed for ten years. It was agreed in 2023 that the first tranche would start in 2025. It is important that this proceeds. It will benefit our students and that is why we are doing it. Teachers agree with it, unions agree with it and students, who have come out very clearly in support of what is proposed, agree with it. Why is that the case? It is because it does not just focus on one day after the end of two years of study. If something goes wrong on that day, there is nowhere else to turn except to repeat the following year. What is proposed will be that we will assess different skills, expertise, abilities and capacities within our younger population and prepare them better for life.

On the measures the Deputy mentioned, I asked the unions to engage with me intensively on the issues that are of concern to them, the questions they had and, most importantly, the asks they had to help us make sure that this is a success. We all want it to be a success. The document that has been agreed deals with the asks from the unions. These are issues focusing on how we can implement more in our science labs and provide greater funding, how we can make sure that teachers have greater sight of the work they have to do in the years ahead and how to provide greater training. Many other issues are also addressed. These are all issues I have engaged intensively with the unions on. It is now a matter for them as to whether they accept what is proposed. I have tried to engage with them on everything they have sought and make sure that we provide the necessary resources and supports. Teachers really want this to work.

Comment on this