We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil
‹ Ceisteanna ar Pholasaí nó ar Reachtaíocht - Questions on Policy or Legislation

Waterford Airport runway funding

Summary

The Deputy again pressed for funding for the Waterford Airport runway extension, saying repeated support had not translated into action and a new business case was now being sought. The Taoiseach said the project must go through the proper gateway process, defended that process, and said the proposal was still moving through it despite the long delay.

I have raised with the Taoiseach dozens of times the need to fund the runway extension at Waterford Airport. Every time I raise it, he says he is supportive and that it is in the programme for Government but there is deep frustration in Waterford as we watch on and see funding given to Dublin, Cork, Shannon, Kerry and Donegal airports, while Waterford is left behind.

Last June I was told in a parliamentary question response by the Minister for Transport that all the information needed was with the Department and Minister. We now hear a new business case is being sought, which brings us back to square one and delays an announcement for years. I cannot overstate the disbelief and frustration in Waterford. What is going on and why is the Government not delivering on its promise to give Waterford a fighting chance to have commercial activity in Waterford Airport?

Comment on this

The Minister of State, Deputy Butler, met with the Minister yesterday on this topic.

Comment on this

Last Wednesday.

Comment on this

Last Wednesday, sorry. Business cases are important and all projects have to go through the gateway process in terms of the Department of public expenditure. As the Deputy knows, on another day in here - his own party is fairly adept at it - expenditures that are just approved without going through those gateways-----

Comment on this

It has been six years.

Comment on this

It is not 60 years.

Comment on this

If the project had not gone through those gateways, the Deputy would be the first to attack it in terms of expenditure.

Comment on this

It was signed off on in 2019.

Comment on this

It is going through a process. Hopefully, we will get it to come out the other end.

Comment on this

Six years later, here we are. It is not good enough.

Comment on this