The fuel allowance scheme is a critical support for many pensioners who are on limited incomes. I acknowledge that must be clear eligibility criteria in respect of payments of this nature. However, an inconsistency in the current system has been brought to my attention. In the case of a pensioner whose adult child has moved back into the family home, if that child is not dependent and is working, the pensioner is deemed ineligible for the fuel allowance under the current rules. At the same time, an eligible person can rent a room to a stranger and earn up to €14,000 per year under the rent-a-room scheme without it affecting their eligibility for the fuel allowance. In the context of the housing crisis, the Taoiseach and I know of many cases where adult children have had to move back in with their elderly parents. It is unfair that these families are being penalised. I ask that this matter be reviewed in order to ensure pensioners will not be disadvantaged because they are providing accommodation to their children.

This is a complex matter, particular as it relates to those who are dependent. Where would the Deputy draw the line in devising a scheme for fuel allowance? It could be broadened exponentially. We have already expanded it to those on the working family payment. Approximately 470,000 people are now entitled to the fuel allowance. We have expanded it significantly from where it was.

I will raise the point the Deputy made with the Minister for Social Protection, but it is not easy. The Deputy is introducing the idea that people working in a house would be entitled to the fuel allowance.

No, I am talking about a person who had to come home. The individual involved is a nurse.

Deputy, please.

I know, but that person would be working.

Deputy, we do not allow back and forth.

How can we differentiate between-----

We do not allow it.

Two thousand euro a month for a house in Portlaoise.

I hear the Deputy.

Deputy, the rules are the rules.