We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil

Written answer

Media Sector

2439. Deputy Fionntán Ó Súilleabháin asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the extent to which section 26 of the International Protection Act 2015 impacts the reporting of criminal proceedings by the media; if his Department has issued, or intends to issue, updated guidance to media organisations to clarify the distinction between protecting an applicant's identity and reporting on public court proceedings; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [59081/26]

Comment on this

2440. Deputy Fionntán Ó Súilleabháin asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if he accepts that Ireland is an outlier in the EU in terms of being the only EU country that has a criminal law which specifically prohibits naming asylum seekers who commit crimes; if he has plans to address this anomaly; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [59082/26]

Comment on this

2442. Deputy Fionntán Ó Súilleabháin asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the extent to which section 26 of the International Protection Act 2015 impacts the reporting of criminal proceedings by the media; if his Department has issued, or intends to issue, updated guidance to media organisations. [59187/26]

Comment on this

2443. Deputy Fionntán Ó Súilleabháin asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if he accepts that Ireland is an outlier in the EU in terms of being the only EU country that has a criminal law which specifically prohibits naming asylum seekers who commit crimes; if he plans to address this anomaly; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [59188/26]

Comment on this
Jim O'Callaghan Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration Fianna Fáil

I propose to take Questions Nos. 2439, 2440, 2442 and 2443 together.

It is a central priority of this Government that our immigration laws are robust and enforced. Since taking office, I have worked to ensure integrity, efficiency, and public confidence in our migration system.

Nothing in the International Protection legislation prevents An Garda Síochána communicating information in the course of an investigation, including personal details of a person where necessary, so long as they have due regard to the requirement not to publish information likely to lead members of the public to identify that person as an international protection applicant without the consent of that person.

The confidentiality principle is a principle of asylum law which is reflected both in the Asylum Procedures Regulation and in our domestic law, the International Protection Act 2015, which applies to asylum applications made before 12th June 2026, and the International Protection Act 2026, which applies to applications made after that date. The confidentiality principle in the Asylum Procedures Regulation is applicable for all Member States.

An asylum-seeker’s claim inherently supposes a fear of persecution by the authorities of their home country and therefore may also mean that their family or friends still living in the country from which they have sought protection, can be jeopardised if their personal information is not confidential.

Therefore, my officials and I are legally obliged to ensure that the identity of any person who applied for international protection is kept confidential. For applicants, whose applications were made prior to 12th June 2026, section 26(1) of the 2015 Act sets out that:

“the Minister and the Tribunal and their respective officers shall take all practicable steps to ensure that the identity of applicants is kept confidential”.

As regards applications made after 12th June 2026, Article 7 of the Asylum Procedures Regulation states that

“1. The authorities applying this Regulation shall be bound by the principle of confidentiality in relation to any personal information they acquire in the performance of their duties, including any exchange of information in accordance with Union or national law which is relevant for the application of this Regulation between authorities of the Member States.

2. Throughout the procedure for international protection and after a final decision on the application has been taken, the authorities shall not:

(a) disclose information regarding the individual application for international protection or the fact that an application has been made, to the alleged actors of persecution or serious harm;

(b) obtain any information from the alleged actors of persecution or serious harm in a manner that would result in such actors being informed of the fact that an application has been made by the applicant in question.”

In line with this, section 278(1) of the International Protection Act 2026 (in similar terms to section 26 of the 2015 Act) provides that:

“A person shall not publish or broadcast, or cause to be published or broadcast, information likely to lead members of the public to identify that a person is an applicant without the consent of that person”.

A person who contravenes this section themselves commits an offence.

The confidentiality requirements contained in both Acts apply to all international applicants including those charged or convicted of criminal offences. This does not mean that cases cannot be covered by the media, but rather that it must be covered in a manner that does not lead to the person being identified as an applicant for international protection. An applicant can themselves consent to being so identified.

Finally, my officials and I have no responsibility for the interpretation of law on behalf of external organisations.

Comment on this