We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil

Written answer

Departmental Data

743. Deputy Joe Cooney asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the estimated cost to the Exchequer of extending the €10,000 Benefit-in-Kind Open Market Value relief for company vehicles beyond 2026, rather than allowing it to reduce to €5,000 in 2027 as currently scheduled; the number of PAYE taxpayers estimated to be affected by this reduction; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [61697/26]

Comment on this
Simon Harris Tánaiste and Minister for Finance Fine Gael

Section 121 of the Taxes Consolidation Act (TCA) 1997 provides that where a car is made available for the private use of an employee then the employee is chargeable to benefit in kind tax (BIK). Where such a benefit is provided for an employee by his or her employer, the employer is required to include that notional payment as part of the employee’s emoluments and to deduct tax via the PAYE system accordingly.

For background, a CO2-based BIK regime for employer provided vehicles became effective from 1 January 2023. From that date the taxable BIK amount is based on the car’s original market value (OMV) and the annual business kilometres driven, with new CO2 emissions-based bands determining whether a standard, discounted, or surcharged rate applies. The number of mileage bands was also reduced from five to four.

While, the new regime provides for higher BIK rates for cars with above average emissions and for those with low business mileage, it should be noted that the rates remained largely the same in the lower to mid mileage ranges for the average lower emission car. Additionally, Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) and plug in hybrids, benefit from a preferential rate of BIK, while fossil-fuel vehicles are subject to higher BIK rates. This new structure with CO2-based discounts and surcharges is designed to incentivise employers to provide employees with low-emission cars.

This brought the taxation of employer provided cars into step with other CO2-based motor taxes as well as with the long-established CO2-based vehicle BIK regimes in other EU Member States.

Due to the impact of the new emissions-based BIK system on certain petrol and diesel cars, Finance Act 2023 introduced a temporary universal relief of €10,000 to the Original Market Value (OMV) of vehicles in Category A1-D, thereby reducing the amount of BIK payable. This measure applied to both cars and vans and meant that, when calculating the BIK liability employers could reduce the OMV by €10,000.

This was extended in Finance Act 2024. Finance Act 2025 further extended this measure, providing that the OMV reduction applies for the years of assessment 2026 to 2028, with the relief for 2027 and 2028 available on a tapered basis. This means that, for the years of assessment 2023 to 2026 inclusive, the OMV is reduced by €10,000, and by €5,000 and €2,500 for the 2027 and 2028 years of assessment, respectively.

It should be noted that an employee who uses an employer provided car mainly for carrying out business journeys (for example, a sales representative) will have generally greater business mileage. Mileage bands ensure that cars that are more integral to the conduct of the business benefit from lower rates of BIK. The reduction in the lower limit of the highest mileage band from 52,001 kilometres to 48,001 kilometres, introduced in the Finance Act 2023 and made permanent in the Finance Act 2025, means that employees with business mileage in excess of 48,001 kilometres can apply the lowest rates of BIK.

Turning to the Deputy's question, I am advised by Revenue that information regarding the purchase and or leasing of vehicles by employers, which are subsequently made available to their employees for private usage, along with the mileage used for both business and private usage is not provided on a tax return.

In addition, employers are not required to provide a detailed breakdown of each of their employees’ BIK tax liabilities on their tax returns.

As this information would be required to make the necessary calculation, it is not possible to estimate the cost to the Exchequer from the proposed change.

Comment on this