Business of Seanad
Is the acting leader in a position to say whether we can take a gap between the two Stages?
Comment on this
What would constitute a sufficiently expansive gap?
Comment on this
This House must insist upon a gap. This is outrageous and a real abnegation of democracy.
Comment on this
I can act only within the order before the House which states we must take all Stages now. Is amendment No. 1 being pressed?
Comment on this
I will press it if we are to take all Stages now but will press it on Report Stage if that is to follow shortly.
Comment on this
If it proves impossible for Senator Bacik to have her amendment considered within this timeframe, this Bill is probably constitutionally suspect.
Comment on this
That is an outrage. I demand that we listen to the Acting Leader and that we ask him to ensure the democratic processes are fulfilled.
Comment on this
If it is helpful, I do not have a problem in creating a gap between Committee and Report Stages. I was late for the Order of Business and did not realise that both Stages had been ordered. The Bill is relatively short.
Comment on this
I thank the Acting Leader. A significant point has been won by this side.
Comment on this
I am grateful to the Acting Leader for that but I would like to know what type of gap he intends before I agree to it.
Comment on this
To be fair, we would need to take Report Stage on a different day if the Minister wishes to take advice. We would need to put it on a different day, to be fair.
Comment on this
On a point of order, we agree to take the next Stage next week. There is no big issue.
Comment on this
It will be very quick but I would be grateful if the matter could be dealt with next week on Report Stage.
Comment on this
I express my gratitude to the acting leader. This is an important moment for the House.
Comment on this
Now that peace has reigned, as I indicated I had no problem going into next week, I would not want any of that to suggest we may come back with an agreement on the amendment because, as I said, we considered this previously. We will consider it again and ask that the opinions, rather than the suspicions, of the other side of the House be taken into account.