We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Youth guarantee and public-sector productivity

Summary

Fidelma Healy Eames supports the youth guarantee but wants it extended to under-30s and seeks debate on building a more productive culture.

To be helpful, I shall respond to Senator Reilly on the issue of youth unemployment. I welcome the youth guarantee scheme proposed by the Minister for Social Protection, Deputy Joan Burton, which is aimed at directing those under 25 years of age into education, training or employment. I would like the scheme extended to those under 30 years of age. The Minister is appearing at the Joint Committee on Education and Social Protection at 10 a.m., which is a good place to ask questions of the Minister. I intend to focus on the issue there.

My question to the Leader is on the hullabaloo around allowances. Everybody was aghast at the weekend as to the reason the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Deputy Brendan Howlin, could cut only one of 1,100 allowances. I ask the Leader to invite the Minister to the House because we need to ask him what went wrong. Mr. David Begg has said that some allowances should go. We must be independent as a Government and cannot expect to be directed by certain groups. We all know that in politics we are at risk of that but there is a robust case for some allowances to be directed into core pay, for example, the allowance for a principal teacher is an addition to the core pay of a teacher. However, there are some ridiculous allowances. We are facing huge cuts to services in the budget and we do not want a two-tier society.

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

Is the Senator seeking a debate on the issue?

Comment on this

I am seeking a debate that will support a productive culture. The Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform may be able to tell the House what went wrong.

Comment on this