Savita Halappanavar inquiry
Senators express sympathy to Savita Halappanavar’s family and support a public inquiry, while others urge caution, fairness to medical staff, and waiting for the two existing reports before judging what further action is needed.
I add my voice and extend my sympathy and respect to the family of Savita Halappanavar, her husband, Praveen, her family and friends. Like Senator Healy Eames, I agree that a public inquiry should be arranged. The HSE and the hospital must carry out their inquiries. Sometimes, and it is not due to a lack of trust, difficult matters need a third eye or an additional opportunity involving somebody who is not connected to the hospital, people who understand but were not involved in this extreme trauma for the family and staff at the hospital. I agree with the call for a public inquiry. I commend the Minister for Health's suggestion that the HSE inquiry should be held up to world scrutiny. Perhaps he will need to agree to a public inquiry. I urge that the expert group's report be examined, as a matter of urgency, and that the Cabinet report, as soon as possible, on its next move. I urge that legislation on the X case is also provided.
Comment on this
With regard to the debate, I recommend to the House and the wider public that they read Mr. David Quinn's article in today's Irish Independent. The media need to be careful not to rush to judgment. Perhaps the Leader might indicate whether the Government has challenged the besmirchment of the country abroad, particularly by the more scurrilous elements of the British press. They have jumped on this sad family tragedy in order to have a go at Ireland without any knowledge of the Irish laws or the practices that are engaged in by the medical profession. As has been pointed out, where the life of a woman is threatened there are medical procedures that will ensure that the mother's life is saved. We await the outcome of the inquiry.
I support the call for the Tánaiste to come here for a debate on the Middle East and Ireland's position vis-à-vis holding the EU Presidency. During that time there will be ongoing dealings, negotiations and exchanges between the EU Presidency and the Israeli authorities. It is a fact that Israel perceives Ireland to be hostile. As Senator Norris will know, Israel views Ireland as being unfriendly. The Tánaiste has been open and adopted a balanced approach to the matter, as has previous Irish Administration. Israel has the impression that Ireland is not friendly and it would be incumbent on the Tánaiste to clarify Ireland's position vis-à-vis its relationship with Israel and to alert the House about the Government's priorities on the Middle East in general.
I have raised the following issue before and shall keep returning to it. There is a growing clamour across Europe - the French and German finance Ministers came on board in the past two days - to investigate the tax paid by multinationals across Europe. The issue will not go away. I raised it here before and I shall continue to do so, particularly when I think of the way that the vulnerable in society will be dealt with in the next budget. It is ironic that it is being said that the cuts will not be any worse than what has been indicated. In other words, €3.5 billion must be taken out of the economy. Who will be hurt? It will hurt the most vulnerable, lone parents and home owners. The cuts will hurt the most vulnerable people in society, yet multinationals engage in legal tax avoidance. It is time we grasped the sacred cow, the multinationals. Yes, they are welcome here but that is not the issue. Are they paying a fair amount of tax when the rest of the country must carry an unfair burden of taxation? Once again I ask that the Minister for Finance will clarify what the Government will do to respond to the queries that arose in France, Germany and the UK about multinationals and the amount of tax that they pay to their respective exchequers.
Comment on this
With regard to the sad and tragic loss of life in Galway, it behoves us all to await the outcome of the two reports or inquiries that are in train. We should not pre-judge what may emanate from them and something else may be required. Let us be calm and wait to see what the reports elicit. It is only then that we can decide if further action is required. That is my advice.
I wish to comment on the potential, or what looks like a definite, miscarriage of justice which has been mentioned and where the wrong person may have been charged. We now know there was a fraudulent insurance claim and a lot of new information has become available. In the first instance, as has been said by the Leader in another context a few days ago, it is a matter for the Garda authorities. There has been gap in time and the Garda authorities are different now. We have had a Donegal inquiry and, therefore, we should be confident that the Garda authorities, at the highest level, can deal with the matter if it has been made known to them. I gather that is the case from what Senator Whelan and other Senators have said. Let us then have a statement from the Minister for Justice and Equality if we need it.