We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Economic hardship and school heating

Summary

Senator Norris highlights unemployment, rising hardship, soup kitchens and schools lacking winter heating.

David P.B. Norris Senator David Norris Independent

Many of us will have noticed road improvements in the area of Dublin Castle with much tarmac being laid, potholes filled and roads made better. It is very largely a cosmetic exercise that conceals the reality for many people. Another soup kitchen is opening today. Unemployment is increasing and people are unable to pay their bills. We are all experiencing straitened circumstances. Remarkably we have learned today that children in schools with no heating in the winter are being told by their teachers to jump up and down and to skip. Their parents are receiving texts advising them to put on extra clothes. I find this pretty appalling. It is Dickensian and hits the poorest and neediest sections in the hardest way possible. They are expected to make up the deficit by raising funds themselves. A substantial number of schools are in debt. Therefore, we must ask the Leader to pass the message to the Government that the Taoiseach's leadership of Europe should not be cosmetic in the way the road improvements around Dublin Castle are. The Taoiseach has been awarded European of the year, on which we wish him well. He has become the poster boy of Europe on the cover of Time magazine. We now need to ask him to step up and earn that reputation. As President of Europe he can put Ireland firmly on the agenda and seek to make arrangements and create the context in which the people will no longer suffer with the system put before them.

I speak as a man and abortion will not affect me. It is a difficult and complex subject, but we should always attempt to understand the position of the other person, in this case a woman. Some 20 years ago or more I said during a debate in this House I was glad of three things: first, that I was not heterosexual; second, that I was not a woman; and third, that I was not married to any man who would value me at the same level as and on the same terms of equality with the fertilised egg. I ask anybody who feels this to try to reverse the equation and ask how he would feel if his wife, girlfriend or consort placed that kind of value on him after 20 years of bearing his children, feeding them, washing their clothes and loving them. That is the value placed on them at the end of it. Mr. Halappanavar put it very well when he said there was a bigger life involved - the life of a woman who could continue to bear children.

Comment on this