We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Time for budget scrutiny

Summary

Senator Cullinane argues that two hours is insufficient for budget scrutiny, prompting a dispute with Senator Landy over Seanad abolition and the record of their parties.

I agree with previous speakers that today is an important day for the people of this State and for the Government. I sincerely hope that today is the day the Government changes course and adopts different policies. I hope it will adopt a position of fairness and that this will be the hallmark of the budget. Many families are struggling and many are paralysed with fear about what the budget might hold. They will be looking to all legislators - all 166 Deputies and 60 Senators - to fairly and properly scrutinise and debate the budget. How is it possible for this House to do that with an allocation of 120 minutes debating time? The Minister will take up ten minutes of that time resulting in 110 minutes of debate, less than two minutes per Senator. It means that fewer than one fifth of the Members of this House will have an opportunity to speak. This is outrageous at a time when people are looking for leadership. We may have disagreements about the tough decisions to be made. However, we are not even allowing for a proper debate. Two hours is not good enough. We are doing an injustice to the people of this State by scheduling only two hours.

I propose an amendment to the Order of Business, that at least four hours' debate be ordered. I will listen to what the Deputy Leader has to say but in my view it is outrageous that not all Members will have an opportunity to speak. We are giving over so little time to what is the biggest issue facing the people of this State today and for the next number of months and years.

I ask the Deputy Leader to agree to allocate more time for today's budget contributions.

Comment on this

It is somewhat ironic that Senator Cullinane, whose party supports the abolition of the Seanad, is now saying he has not enough time to speak. I find that quite amusing.

Comment on this

We did not support the abolition of the Seanad. Senator Landy is factually incorrect again.

Comment on this

None the less, I am sure he has amended-----

Comment on this

We are the only party that supported its retention. The Senator should get his facts right. It is misinformation.

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

Senator Landy without interruption.

Comment on this

I am sure his amendment-----

Comment on this

Senator Landy should apologise and say he was wrong.

Comment on this