Bank board culture
Paul Coghlan argues that public-interest directors are unnecessary and captured by bank culture, prompting debate over their legal status, remuneration and effectiveness.
I concur with the remarks made by the Leader of the Opposition and everyone else in respect of the Cathaoirleach, Deirdre, Jody, Aisling, all of the other staff and Members. I extend my good wishes to everyone.
Reference was made earlier to public interest directors. There is no such thing in law as a public interest director. They are all non-executive-----
Comment on this
Of course they are paid; they are directors.
Comment on this
Will the Senators hear me out? I seek the Cathaoirleach's protection.
Comment on this
Did the Senator buy 17% of Irish Life?
Comment on this
No. Let us be honest, the people to whom I refer are surplus to requirements.
Comment on this
I have no doubt that the late Brian Lenihan - God be good to him - had very good intentions when he appointed the people in question. However, there is nothing to distinguish them from others. We thrashed this matter out yesterday with Mr. Ray MacSharry, who meant well and provided a good overview, and Ms Margaret Hayes. There is a need for fewer directors within these institutions and we certainly do not need public interest directors because they are all captured by the prevailing culture of the institutions to which they have been appointed.
Comment on this
If the Senator includes NAMA in that regard, we will support him.
Comment on this
I am simply explaining, for the benefit of all Senators, that the boards of these institutions rule by consensus. Everything is governed by loyalty.
Comment on this
Mr. Ray MacSharry did not appreciate it when I informed him, with respect, that public interest directors were as useful as paps on a bull.