We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Mercer report and bank pay

Summary

Senator O’Brien seeks clarity on the Mercer report and proposed bank-pay cuts; Senator Bacik welcomes efforts to renegotiate pay and related job announcements.

On behalf of my colleagues in Fianna Fáil, I pass on the sympathy of my party on the recent death of former Deputy Harry Blaney who represented County Donegal with such great distinction. Niall, his son, another former Deputy, is a friend of mine. The service will be held tomorrow. I thank Harry and his family for their dedication and service to the State over many generations.

Will the Leader ask the Minister for Finance about the status of the Mercer report on bank pay and conditions? I asked him last week to obtain a commitment from the Government that the proposed cuts of between 6% and 10% would be heavily weighted against the executives and board members of the two pillar banks and Permanent TSB, the banks over which we have control. Over the weekend I noted with great interest the statement of the Minister for Finance, Deputy Michael Noonan, that bankers' pay should be cut substantially at executive level. I agree wholeheartedly, but I cannot marry his comment with the fact that he decided to abstain from voting on the pay of executives in Bank of Ireland. The Minister, on behalf of the people, holds a 15% stake in that bank, yet he chose to remain silent despite the fact that senior executives in the bank will have pay packages of over €800,000. The governor of the Bank of Ireland who works in a part-time capacity has a pay packet of nearly €500,000. The Government decided it had no opinion on it. While it was great to read his opinion in the Irish Independent on Saturday that the levels of pay were unsustainable, why, then, did he not use his vote on behalf of the people when the remuneration package was put to the shareholders of Bank of Ireland last week? I am still at a loss to understand why.

Will the Leader update the House and arrange a discussion on the negotiations on Croke Park II which was an abject failure? The Government, including the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Deputy Brendan Howlin, in particular, failed completely to allow and enable a deal to be done with the trade unions. This is the first time in 25 years we have not been able to bring the trade unions in the public sector on board. After the vote resulted in defeat, I welcomed the fact that the Minister had put Mr. Kieran Mulvey in charge to talk to the union side and determine whether we could move forward in some way. The Government gave Mr. Mulvey two weeks and within three days it was briefing against the public sector. Again, there were threats that it would cut pay and pensions. There was a threat of a 7% arbitrary cut across the board and the threat to job security is being made again. Why can the Minister and others not just keep their mouths shut and let the negotiations happen in a respectful manner and in private? Three days after the appointment of Mr. Mulvey to try to bring forward a resolution and a way forward, the Government was briefing against the public sector. The public sector carries out an extremely important role. I include gardaí, firefighters, teachers, nurses and staff in all Departments. How in God's name can one expect to get a deal if one is threatening people with a 7% cut across the board? That is not the way to do business. In the next couple of weeks I would like the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform to explain in the House the Government's position. I again formally call on the Government to withdraw the threat of an arbitrary cut of 7% across the board should a deal not be reached.

Comment on this

It is ironic to hear Fianna Fáil present itself as champion of the public sector having imposed pay cuts when it was in government and after the failed policy of decentralisation which destroyed morale in large parts of the public sector.

However, as I said in the House last week, I welcome the fact that Mr. Kieran Mulvey has been invited to bring the parties together to see if a renegotiation is possible. We all await the outcome of that process.

I also welcome the announcement today of the creation of 1,000 construction jobs in the planned upgrade of the N7 and N11. As a very welcome consequence, we will see the removal of the bottleneck at Newlands Cross. This is a really important deal. It is worth €282 million and will provide some comfort to those who have lost jobs in the construction sector. It is a very welcome announcement.

I seek a debate on the levels of autism in Ireland. The survey commissioned by Irish Autism Action is examining the prevalence of autism in Ireland. I hope that before long this House will have before it the Private Members' Bill that was accepted in the Dáil, the autism Bill brought forward by my Labour Party colleague, Deputy Michael McCarthy. While I hope there will be a debate on that Bill in the House, we might also have a general debate on the prevalence of autism in Ireland and the best methods of education for children with autism.

The Cabinet meeting today has adjourned. We understand it was considering the heads of a Bill on the X case, 21 years after the Supreme Court judgment in that case. It is welcome that heads of a Bill have been prepared and are being discussed by the Cabinet with a view to providing clarity, at last, to doctors, pregnant women and their families as to the criteria which may be applied where a doctor needs to intervene to save a woman's life.

Comment on this