Sentencing and parole policy
Senator O’Neill calls for debate on sentencing and parole, arguing that serious offenders should receive mandatory sentences and that life sentences should mean life.
I was wondering if this was Groundhog Day. I agree with Senator Hayden about the coverage of this House but it seems that Members want to grandstand to try to get headlines in the press or on the radio.
Comment on this
It reflects on the excellent contribution Members are making if some have to grandstand to feature in press coverage. I ask the Leader for a debate. I agree with Senators Bacik and Mullen on the law reform report on sentencing. This was brought home to all of us with the situation in Victoria, Australia, where the trial for the murder and rape of the Irish lady, Jill Meagher, has been taking place. A person who had raped 21 times was out on parole, something that could also happen in our country. We need a debate on sentencing and parole. Will the Leader ask the Minister for Justice and Equality to come to the House and debate this? I do not agree with Senator Mullen, however, that there should not be mandatory sentencing or that sentencing should be by an executive decision.
Comment on this
We should have mandatory sentencing and if a life sentence is given down it should be for life.