We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Debate on banking responsibility

Summary

Senators argue over responsibility for converting bank debt into sovereign debt and call for a banking debate and inquiry, while the Chair repeatedly directs speakers to state their procedural requests.

The Senator's party supported it.

Comment on this

It has again been proven-----

Comment on this

Sinn Féin supported it.

Comment on this

-----that the only parties which supported-----

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

Is there a question for the Leader?

Comment on this

-----turning the Anglo Irish Bank debt into sovereign debt were Fianna Fáil - which was no surprise - and Fine Gael and Labour, along with some Independents in the House.

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

Is there a question?

Comment on this

I support the need for-----

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

Is there a question for the Leader?

Comment on this

I ask that we have that debate on banking and the need for a banking inquiry.

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

Are you proposing an amendment to the Order of Business?

Comment on this

It has been made.

Comment on this

I thought one had been proposed but, if not, I propose an amendment.

Comment on this

I join other Senators in expressing my outrage at the revelations on the tapes. Caution is required as in a year or whenever it comes to pass that these people come before the courts, there will be senior counsels arguing that prejudice will arise from the amount of information in the public domain. We must be very careful about the level of detail with which we discuss these matters. I appreciate Senator Crown's point that the issue of getting the information out there is important, but we must hope that at least one good thing will come from the publication of the tape transcripts, and there will be pressure to have an inquiry. The question is why it has not happened before now.

The Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement is vastly under-resourced, and this is perhaps highlighted by the fall in the number of convictions for white collar crimes. The number fell to just 178 in 2010, compared with 579 in 2003, although the number of white collar cases increased in that period. It is a startling statistic and although the director is trying to do the best job possible, one wonders if the office needs much more resources. One also wonders whether with further foresight legislative provisions should have been created to oblige executives to disclose any material facts before any State intervention could take place, and if material facts were not disclosed by these criminals, this could be punishable by conviction.

If people were unfortunately injured because of a train crash, an inquiry would be carried out. People have been seriously injured, not least in a psychological sense, because of the demise of the economy.

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

The Senator has gone beyond her allotted time.

Comment on this

I appreciate the indulgence. Why has the process taken so long and could we please have the Minister for Finance before the House to let us know when the inquiry will take place?

Comment on this