I repeat my request to the Leader and I ask him to reconsider his response that only ten minutes would be allotted to speakers on the Second Stage of the so-called Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill. This is one of the most important, dramatic and far-reaching items of legislation to come before the Houses. It is unacceptable-----

The timings can be decided on the day of the debate.

That may be the case but the response yesterday was unsatisfactory and I ask the Leader to reconsider. In order to look at these issues properly in terms of the overall policy, as distinct from looking at matters section by section, more time is needed. That is the least we can expect given what the Government is proposing. I would also take exception to the Leader's reference to filibustering in his response. I thought it was a cheap shot and I do not know who it was directed at but I assume it is directed at those who have expressed significant concern about the legislation.

I have filibustered in the past, so has Senator Mullen.

I do not regard the tactic of filibustering as being appropriate-----

Some 77 amendments were submitted, all exactly the same.

-----but I believe in searching and sustained scrutiny of serious issues. It is not acceptable to have a nod and wink arrangement whereby on one hand there is tacit approval from the Government side and from the Leader when people do whatever is necessary to speak up for the retention of the Seanad and to speak for as long as possible while, at the same time, curtailing the Seanad in its function, a function we should lay claim to at this time more than ever, of scrutinising legislation carefully and, if necessary, at length. I ask the Leader not to go there again on the subject of filibustering but rather to respect the conscience and professionalism of Members. I ask him to reconsider the proposal that a mere ten minutes be allotted to each speaker on Second Stage.

Senator Mullen is over time.