We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

MABS exclusion from debt scheme

Summary

Senator Coghlan raises concern that MABS and the credit unions were excluded from the Central Bank’s pilot debt-resolution scheme after lender objections.

I am concerned, as I know all Members are, about the absence of the MABS and the Irish League of Credit Unions from the Central Bank pilot debt scheme. We learned this week that the well respected Government-funded body, the MABS, has been forced out of the new pilot resolution scheme being set up by the Central Bank because lenders were not happy with their part in the process. That is a worrying development. The Irish Independent quoted a MABS spokesperson as saying they were booted out of the scheme because the MABS approach to debt resolution was not acceptable to certain members. The MABS had been proposing a more holistic approach to debt resolution and apparently this was not acceptable to some banks. It now looks as if the Central Bank will seek to get a United Kingdom debt charity or a debt collection service to get involved in place of the MABS. That is a very worrying development because it means that the pilot process set up at the initiative of the banks now only comprises the Central Bank and the lenders.

It is devoid of the involvement of those who are concerned about financial services from the perspective of the borrower and the wider general public. The Irish League of Credit Unions opted out because its members regarded it as too one-sided against borrowers. Now the banks have succeeded in getting the MABS excluded because they do not like the proposals from it. We need to become involved and to find out more about the situation. We need to ensure the Central Bank is not being led by the nose by some banks. We all accept that this is a very important initiative. It is a major concern that the Central Bank is apparently allowing the banks to dictate terms and set the parameters for the scheme. This partnership and close co-operation in the past, as we know, has yielded woeful results for the consumer and the wider public. I call on the Governor of the Central Bank and the heir apparent to Mr. Elderfield, Ms Fiona Muldoon, to show that the Central Bank is independent of the banks - which it is meant to be - and can resist their attempts to mould an initiative in a way which sets the lenders' agenda. I call on the Leader to arrange an early debate. We have asked for this debate before and I acknowledge it has been difficult to arrange. I suggest we have this debate very early in the new term because this is a most important subject.

Comment on this