I wish to raise an important case concerning whistleblowing which has been brought to my attention. I will not name the individual because I know it is not the practice of the House. A 59-year-old German national who is a former employee of IBM Ireland's sales division reported apparent and alleged irregularities in IBM Ireland's sales figures this year. She was brought to court by the company because it was seeking equipment she had - namely, a laptop and a USB stick.

If the case is before the courts it is sub judice.

I wish to make a point and I can stray from the court case to do so. The woman is being pursued through the courts. She has lost everything, including her job, and is effectively homeless. She is facing jail-----

She is readily identifiable.

With respect, this is in the context of-----

Does the Senator seek a debate on the issue?

Yes. This is in the context of the Protected Disclosures Bill 2013, which has been published. We must have a debate on it and see it progress. We must protect whistleblowers. Consider the stark contrast between the treatment of whistleblowers and others. Here is an individual who has lost everything and is facing jail, but not one of the bankers who brought down the State is facing jail. This appals people and I appeal to the Leader of the House to ensure the legislation is on the agenda during the next term. Let us ensure we protect whistleblowers and that we do not have situations in which they face custodial sentences, homelessness and job loss for telling the truth.