We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Seanad referendum posters

Summary

Senator Norris criticises Government-funded referendum posters and seeks another public debate on Seanad abolition, defending the value of the House.

David P.B. Norris Senator David Norris Independent

It is welcome that Senator Bacik has demonstrated that there is a bit of a conscience left in the Labour Party. How cute of the Government to ensure the budget is held two weeks after the referendum. If it were to be held two weeks prior to it, there would be no question about the result.

I would like to comment on some posters I have seen.

I was particularly interested in the Labour Party posters, one of which I saw on Gardiner Street last night. People will recognise the rhythm of the slogan, "One People, One Parliament, One Vote", in the words of another slogan, "Ein Reich, Ein Volk, Ein Führer". I wonder which nincompoop thought it up.

We also had the drivel from the Taoiseach about having fewer politicians. What is the Taoiseach, if not a politician? Perhaps he is a vet; I am not sure.

Comment on this
Denis O'Donovan An Leas-Chathaoirleach Fianna Fáil

Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?

Comment on this
David P.B. Norris Senator David Norris Independent

When will we have another opportunity to debate this issue in public? The campaign posters are a shocking waste of public money by the Government. Let us not lie about this - it is taxpayers' money. The Government states it is party money but where does party money come from? The Government is worried about €4 million being spent on the Seanad, which has done a significant amount of work on legislation. The Seanad is different from the Dáil where Deputies have little fights and call each other names before the teams are wheeled in to make the obvious decision. The Seanad achieves things by means of reasoned discussion, yet we are called elitist.

I am glad I had Senator Crown sitting next to me when I was diagnosed with cancer. I did not go to the local butcher and ask him if he knew anything about liver cancer but went to somebody who knew something. That is what this House is for. Many other Senators and I have had legislation withdrawn by the Government. We did not vote down Bills but persuaded Governments to withdraw Bills by virtue of our intelligence, capacity and special knowledge. For this reason, it is vital that we keep the Seanad. The Government can state party rather than Government money is being spent on the campaign. I doubt if the money for the posters I have seen was raised in a jumble sale in Tooreenydohenybeg. That is all I can say on that issue.

A unit of Ballinasloe hospital was closed shortly after €3 million was spent on it, while another €1 million was spent on St. Michael's House, an issue Senator Darragh O'Brien raised. These two sums would pay for the Seanad for one year. The expenses claimed in the Dáil would also pay for this place.

It is important to have a continuing series of debates on the proposed abolition of the Seanad. We must inform people because the Government deliberately forestalled by refusing to allow the matter to be discussed in the Constitutional Convention. People have suffered enough through cutbacks to services for the weakest and most vulnerable, including carers and people with cancer who had their medical cards withdrawn. We also had the introduction of a property tax and evictions. This is the only opportunity they have to give a good kick to the Government that screwed them when it voted for the bank guarantee, which many of my colleagues and I voted and argued against.

The House will be interested to note that the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs will discuss the situation in Syria with the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade at 4.30 p.m.

Comment on this