We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Defence of the Seanad

Summary

Senators defend the Seanad’s record of behind-the-scenes legislative work and public engagement, criticise the campaign to abolish it and argue that its future should be judged on its merits.

I would like to comment briefly on what Senator Eamonn Coghlan said, and I agree with him. I am not aware of a single Senator in this Chamber who does not work behind the scenes, championing causes and reform. I can point to legislation where my intervention caused an amendment to be made to a Bill. I know that every Member of this House is in the exactly the same position. Just because an amendment does not go down as an Opposition amendment and is accepted by a Minister does not make it any less valid. I am convinced that irrespective of what the people do on Friday, every Member of this House will continue to work and champion the causes they have championed up to now.

Comment on this
Senators

Hear, hear.

Comment on this

One of the most regrettable aspects of the campaign has been the failure to discuss the merits of voting for or against the abolition of the Seanad on the basis of the merits of the Seanad, as well as a move - as I perceive has been done in the public domain - to undermine the valid work that has been done by this Chamber, not only by this Seanad but by previous Seanaid. That is disgraceful. It is also disgraceful and regrettable, and this is my personal perception, that this House has been starved of business over recent weeks deliberately to make us look ineffective.

Comment on this
Senators

Hear, hear.

Comment on this

I await to see what will happen after the referendum is done and dusted and what level of legislation will suddenly appear in this House.

I am disappointed that we have had not had a debate on the upcoming budget in this House. One issue which I would like to have raised is the fact that we spend €60 million dealing with the direct impact of diabetes, directly linked to obesity, and yet some children in this country go to school hungry. One of the proposals made by a number of organisations was for the imposition of a nutrition tax. I would like to have had the opportunity to have had that proposal seriously considered in this House and the revenue it would yield ring-fenced to delivering food to needy children in schools. I ask the Leader to bring that proposal to the attention of the relevant Minister.

Comment on this

The situation regarding the NGOs addressing Members of the House is a serious one and it should be addressed. To whatever extent this House can influence the Committee on Procedure and Privileges of the other House, that needs to be done. One wonders, with the abolition of the Seanad on Friday what is next - the abolition of protests on Kildare Street? I agree with Senator Hayden that despite the best efforts of the Leader of the House - who as I have said many times previously, is the best Leader we have had in the 11 years I have been a Member of this House - the Government has manipulated a scenario to guarantee the abolition of the Seanad by starving it of business and by allowing Ministers to write reckless articles in the newspapers, such as the one written by the Minister of State, Deputy Cannon. No doubt, to write that article he did not have to sit in the office of The Connacht Tribune and, regardless of where he is in the world, presumably he has access to a phone in Istanbul or wherever he is. He should comment on this because that article is nothing short of reckless.

As one of the only two members of the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission in this House, I have not said this previously but it needs to be put on the record, and I sure Senator Whelan would agree with me. As somebody who presides over the costs of the Oireachtas and is on the finance committee of the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission, I wanted to put on the record that the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission at no time said that the cost of running the Seanad was €20 million or anywhere near it. Anybody who stands over that figure and persists in stating it as a fact is telling lies. That is the plain truth of the matter, and I say that as a member of the Houses of the Oireachtas Commission.

I ask the Leader if a Minister might be available to discuss the issue of social partnership. We are seeing the beginnings of serious unrest with the teachers' strike that has begun and a junior doctors' strike due to be held next week. Social partnership was a champion with which Governments were allowed to lead Ireland to recovery in the 1980s and at other times in our history. It is required now by whatever Government is in place. I ask that Ministers at these late stages would try to get people to sit around the table and try to find some middle ground because that would be in all our interests.

Comment on this