We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Senators’ representation allowance

Summary

Senator MacSharry argues that the restrictive audit criteria for Senators’ representation allowances require urgent amendment by statutory instrument, despite the Chair’s objection to raising the matter.

I ask the Leader about an issue that has come up that warrants raising here on the Order of Business. As Members would be aware, the remuneration and expenses paid to Members of the Houses are now fully vouched, which, of course, we all welcome as a much more transparent system and one that was needed for a long time. There is, however, a situation that remains with regard to the representation allowance that will be paid to Senators next year.

The audit criteria for the allowance have been approved for the coming year, with the agreement of the Minister. The criteria are prohibitively narrow in the view of most Members and need to be altered and adjusted to ensure they can do their work fully and claim the appropriate expenses in line with the legislation and existing statutory instrument. It seems the Minister is not prepared to issue a statutory instrument to take cognisance of and give effect to the necessary parameters pertaining to eligible expenses. For the past year and a half many of us have pursued this matter privately with the Minister, the Oireachtas commission and administration committee. I ask the Leader to arrange with the Cathaoirleach and relevant authorities an immediate meeting of the Committee on Procedure and Privileges. A delegation should meet the Minister to seek the introduction of the necessary statutory instrument before the recess. Failure to do so will have unintended consequences for all Senators, which will impinge on their ability to successfully perform their duties.

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

The matter the Senator raises is not suitable for discussion on the Order of Business.

Comment on this

It has been suggested primary legislation is required to give effect to the necessary changes, but that is not the case, as officials confirmed to me this week. A statutory instrument is required and I hope the Committee on Procedure and Privileges, following its meeting, will impress on the Minister the need to introduce a statutory instrument as a matter of the utmost urgency. I reiterate that primary legislation is not required. What is required is the political and ministerial will to give effect to something that is necessary for Members to do their job effectively.

Comment on this