Pensions and future financial security
Senator Walsh seeks a debate on pensions and inadequate retirement saving, while Senator Healy Eames supports dedicated ministerial responsibility and warns that pension provision and home repossessions require urgent planning.
Will the Minister for Social Protection attend the House for a debate on pensions? It is essential we have a strong, analytical and informed debate on the issue. Recent reports have shown that young people who have the opportunity to pay into pension schemes because their employers are making contributions are not doing so. As a consequence, they will find themselves disadvantaged in later life. Last night I spoke to somebody who was in receipt of a pension from the Houses of the Oireachtas and paying tax at 53%. There is a need to look at this issue. Part of the debate should revolve around the appointment of a Minister or a Minister of State with responsibility for pensions because somebody should focus on pensions solely. It is clear that the Minister for Social Protection who covers a wide-ranging area with many challenges cannot put the focus that is necessary on this area, especially if we are to meet the huge demographic challenges which will arise in the coming decades. I appeal for a debate on this issue. The State pension will be inadequate to provide for people in old age because of the fiscal position. We must, therefore, encourage and incentivise people to participate and providing for themselves in old age, which means having a proper, well thought out and coherent pension policy, which is not in place.
Comment on this
I support Senator Jim Walsh's proposal for a Minister or a Minister of State solely responsible for pensions. This is a time bomb. We have some time, but we need to start to plan because the demographics speak for themselves, as the Senator said.
The time bomb about which I wish to speak and which I mentioned yesterday is home repossessions. We know from the banks, the representatives of which attended the Joint Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform last week, that thousands of home repossessions are imminent. One's second highest right after the right to life is the right to property. Currently, the Government provides €250 for a person in difficulty to visit an accountant. I have been talking to MABS, the staff of which essentially are accountants, and its service is free. It would be better if the €250 was given to a legal person, a solicitor, because people are worn down as a result of having to deal with huge difficulties, for which we all know the reasons. Many of them are in difficulty not because of anything they have done but because of the recession, job cuts or perhaps a family illness and they need legal advice. Let us not disable them anymore. I would like the Leader to convey my recommendation to the Minister for Finance, Deputy Michael Noonan, that the €250 being provided for accounting advice be provided for a solicitor to advise before people relinquish their family homes, if they have to do so. We must protect the people concerned. We need the Minister to come to the House to consider more creative solutions to enable people to hold on to their family homes rather than have them repossessed. If that means the State has to take an equity stake in the family home to allow a family to rent at local authority rent rates, let us do it. We know there is a housing crisis; therefore, what is the point in putting the people in question, for whom we cannot find homes, out on the street and having them draw rent allowance? I will continue to raise this issue until we find a solution because to lose one's home is the last straw for a family. It causes stress for everybody, including children. One cannot parent properly when one has to endure such stress in one's life.