Defence of McNulty appointment
Government Senators defend McNulty as qualified for the Seanad and IMMA board, citing his arts and community involvement and the governing articles of association. Opposition Senators challenge the evidence, the appointment’s timing and claims that the board role was undertaken pro bono.
I have great respect for the Members opposite, including Senator Darragh O'Brien, who is normally quite sanguine. I am not sure why the people opposite are getting so excited. I say that with respect. We understand well how democracy functions. Regardless of the appointment to IMMA, this man would have been more than qualified to be on the Cultural and Educational Panel. We are aware of his arts and culture work-----
Comment on this
He is involved in everything in Kilcar, County Donegal.
Comment on this
He refused to take part in a Radio na Gaeltachta debate with a Gaeltacht candidate, someone who speaks Irish, according to the recommendations of the Members opposite.
Comment on this
He has a wider involvement than that, as the Senator knows, but I will not go down that road.
Comment on this
I do know it but I will not waste the time of the House. I will talk to Senator Norris about it outside the Chamber. The Opposition is shamelessly chasing headlines.
Comment on this
This man was prepared to act pro bono, like everyone else. He is as qualified-----
Comment on this
He is as qualified as a former councillor, company director, barrister-----
Comment on this
-----I ask Senator Paul Coghlan to correct the record, because no board member, bar the chairman, is entitled to claim expenses from IMMA. He is not doing work pro bono because he would not have received a fee anyway.
Comment on this
People are talking about nine, 11 or 15 board members, but the memorandum and articles of association govern the situation.
Comment on this
Has Senator Coghlan read them? If he had read them, the hairs would stand at the back of his neck.