McNulty affair and Seanad election
Senator Norris criticises the McNulty appointment and the continued Seanad election controversy, despite the Chair’s attempts to keep discussion within the Order of Business.
I join in the welcome to our distinguished Austrian colleagues.
The longer the McNulty affair continues, the more everybody, particularly in political life, is negatively affected. I have been trying to understand the Taoiseach's position. I am sure this will be an issue of curiosity and interest to our Austrian friends. Apparently, the Taoiseach sees no discrepancy at all between sustaining a rotten borough election in which there are 225 votes involved to elect somebody to this House and the national Parliament and his attempts to dilute the independent university seats, of which there are six, and expand that electorate to 850,000 votes. Somebody should take note of this.
Another issue is that Mr. McNulty has withdrawn from the election. He announced his withdrawal and that announcement was repeated in the Dáil. However, people are still voting for him and it is said that he can be elected. How can somebody be elected if he has withdrawn from the election? It is said his name remained on the ballot paper. He could have died and remained on it, but would he be elected then? Would he take his seat in the House as a corpse? This is nonsense. His name could have and should have been withdrawn and those votes cast for him should be discounted.
Last week, when we dealt with the Freedom of Information Act, the Government prated about the importance of letting a prurient press pore over all our taxi receipts and receipts for a sandwich here and there. "Freedom of information" is a buzz phrase that is all over the place, yet Deputy Heather Humphreys, the Minister for Arts-----
Comment on this
We are not discussing last week's business today. Does the Senator have a question for the Leader?
Comment on this
I am sorry; I only stopped because I thought the Chair was making an intelligent interruption.
Comment on this
It is directly relevant to what I am saying today. Is the Cathaoirleach saying history is dead?
Comment on this
Is history dead? Can we not refer to anything that happened earlier than this minute? What absolute nonsense.
Comment on this
We re-enact it as we speak.