We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Recognition of Palestine

Summary

Senator Norris supports recognising Palestine and condemns Israel’s conduct in Gaza and the inadequate monitoring of human-rights obligations.

David P.B. Norris Senator David Norris Independent

I welcome and support Senator Averil Power's motion concerning the recognition of the state of Palestine.

The Cathaoirleach himself recalled the Seanad, most unusually, during the summer to discuss Gaza during the appalling onslaught on it by Israel. It is a horrifying situation to think the Euro-Med agreement is in place with human rights protocols attached to it but which are never even monitored. There were clear violations of international human rights and war crimes committed, yet we continue as if absolutely nothing had happened.

In the wider sphere of the United Nations, a majority of states now recognise Palestine including a growing number of European states such as Sweden. It would be very timely if we recognised Palestine. This should put some pressure on the state of Israel which seeks to frustrate any efforts at any stage where there is a possibility of peace. Even as we speak, the Israelis are continuing with their illegal programme of settlement development. I strongly support this motion and gather it will go through with unanimous agreement, which is significant in itself. I hope it will soon be translated into action.

I also want to raise the issue of Watergate. I am not referring to Irish Water but the death of a great man of the press, Ben Bradlee. While some Members might be too young to remember it, I recall the excitement, the cloak and dagger atmosphere of meetings in basements of government buildings in Washington, Deep Throat and the writing of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. This was real investigative journalism. We get a lot of pap in this country of prurient, poking, nosing and snivelling writing by journalists which is then dressed up as investigative journalism. Like hell it is. Anyone who wants to see what investigative journalism is, let them look at the Watergate scandal and the way it was covered by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein under the direction of Ben Bradlee.

Comment on this