We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Plans for 1916 commemorations

Summary

Senator O’Sullivan calls for the Government to end delays in publishing its 1916 commemorations plan, warning that the absence of an official blueprint encourages revisionism.

I support Senator Mooney's call for an end to the foot-dragging on the 1916 commemorations. I have mentioned this once or twice before. I read a newspaper article by historian Diarmaid Ferriter, who is on the commission, in which he declared his impatience with the Minister's tardiness in presenting it with a plan. She has given a commitment to come before the House, but she should have done so before now. In the absence of a formal Government blueprint, every kind of revisionism is gaining a foothold. I do not want to dump on Sinn Féin again, but the most ridiculous occurrence was the announcement by Deputy Gerry Adams last week that John Redmond was a man of violence. I had to laugh at that one. We need the Government to announce a plan. There is a certain tardiness on the Government side. Maybe it is worried that in some way the celebrations would turn into some kind of post hoc vindication of the terrible atrocities that occurred in the North and had absolutely nothing to do with 1916. I can understand that, but we need to have an agreed procedure for the nation to pay proper homage to the leaders of 1916.

Members have received correspondence from a number of county councillors on the title of mayor not being applied in certain municipal areas. There is a Lord Mayor of Dublin, a Mayor of Limerick and a Mayor of Galway, but there is no mayor, for example, of Listowel, where I come from, Killarney-----

Comment on this

We are using the title.

Comment on this