We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Irish Water referendum implications

Summary

Senators debate whether Irish Water should be constitutionally protected from privatisation. Senator Coghlan urges reflection and further examination, while Senator Leyden warns that existing private water contracts and community schemes complicate any referendum.

No one wants to see Irish Water sold and I take on board many of the points made by Senator O'Brien. There is existing legislation and many issues to be examined. I am not stating the Senator is right or wrong. I do not think any of us can at this point be definitive, but I do not think we should rush into it. Senator Norris made a point on this being a reflective Chamber. On this issue we need to reflect a little.

Comment on this

We have a lot of reflection to do.

Comment on this

I am not procrastinating, but I am opposed to rushing into anything.

Comment on this

We are looking for clarity.

Comment on this

What Senator Cullinane thinks might be clarity today might not be tomorrow, with respect.

Comment on this

You might want to sell it off tomorrow.

Comment on this

Senator Cullinane should look at what his leader said at the beginning and what he is saying now. We are all in solidarity with people who genuinely cannot afford to pay. There will be a scheme, whether a waiver or whatever, for these people. I accept what Senator O'Brien stated, namely, that everybody wants to do the right thing. I want to see this being a reflective Chamber. I want to see us doing the right thing.

Comment on this

Have a referendum.

Comment on this

I just do not think we can say definitively now what the right approach is.

Comment on this

That is the right approach.

Comment on this

We need to examine things.

Comment on this

Provide clarity, please.

Comment on this

Pause a while on this. We will examine it. We will have a debate later today-----

Comment on this

Make it meaningful by passing the motion.

Comment on this

-----and perhaps some good suggestions will come forward. I appeal to Senators to reflect and give it a little time rather than rushing to a vote willy-nilly.

Comment on this

As far as a referendum is concerned, and it is a matter to be considered later, those drafting it had better be aware that Veolia, which has major investments in water in this country, has already privatised part of the water system. In 2010 it was awarded a 20-year contract to design, build and operate Greystones wastewater treatment facility. Its largest municipal contract in Ireland is the Clareville drinking water treatment plant. It has water collection operations in Roscommon. It operates from Kilkenny and has offices in Sligo, Galway and Roscommon. Somebody tell me how we can have a referendum now on contracts already granted for more than 20 years. Would Veolia be excluded from a referendum or would its contracts be torn up in this regard?

Comment on this

They are also investments.

Comment on this

Be very well aware that contracts have been entered into with a private multinational company, Veolia, which now operates throughout the length and breadth of Ireland in treatment plants for water and sewerage. Let us get real about this. Privatisation has already taken place. I have no problem with referendums, but if one is drafted be very conscious of the fact there will be a constitutional-----

Comment on this

Tell Senator O'Brien-----

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

Senator Leyden, without interruption, please.

Comment on this

I am informing the House of the realities of life with regard to a constitutional referendum. I support my colleague, Senator O'Brien, on a referendum, but there are private schemes in Glinsk and Oran in my area and in a sense they are in community ownership. Would these water schemes have to be taken back into public ownership or would they be excluded from operating these schemes? Bear in mind it is not a simplistic question. I just want to bring this to the attention of the House, based on my experience in both Houses and in dealing with Veolia, which is a very demanding operator-----

Comment on this

That is why we must examine it further.

Comment on this

Of course we will examine it, but I am alerting my colleagues to the fact that whatever constitutional amendment is drafted it will have to exclude those companies operating at present which have privatised supplies in various parts of the countryside, including Roscommon. I am aware of this information and I would not by carrying out my responsibilities if I did not bring them to the attention of the House. I have very detailed analysis on the amount of water being treated by Veolia in Ireland at present and I will bring it to the attention of the media today.

Comment on this