References to absent Members
Senator Kelly seeks clarification about the rule against naming absent Members, prompting an extended procedural dispute and repeated rulings that the issue is outside the Order of Business.
I wish to raise the issue of double standards in the House. If a Member is absent from the House, can I not mention his name?
Comment on this
I refer to Senator Leyden's absence yesterday. In that case, am I not allowed to mention his name?
Comment on this
Why would anybody want to?
Comment on this
That is interesting. Yesterday, when I was absent from the House, Senator Leyden came in and mentioned my name. When I came in here to refute what he said-----
Comment on this
-----I was ruled out of order. Again this morning, Senator Leyden came in here, in my absence, and raised my name. I ask the Acting Chairman to explain the matter.
Comment on this
My query is about standards in this House.
Comment on this
Senator Leyden has a habit of coming in here to make his speech and then running out the door. Perhaps he is auditioning for a television drama.
Comment on this
On a point of order, the Senator has abused his position by what he has said. Unless he has something to say that is relevant to the Order of Business then he should sit down.
Comment on this
Senator Kelly keeps referring-----
Comment on this
The Acting Chairman must extend protection to Members around here.
Comment on this
One does not have to outline what is relevant and what is not relevant.
Comment on this
I have a right to get clarity on this issue for the future, because every time I am absent Senator Leyden mentions my name and every time I mention his name I am ruled out of order.
Comment on this
The Senators should stop upsetting each other.
Comment on this
We are dealing with today's Order of Business. I ask the Senator to stick to the Order of Business, please.
Comment on this
I still have not got clarity from the House as to what happens in the future should Senator Leyden mention my name again.
Comment on this
What will happen is that the Senator will be ruled out of order.
Comment on this
I shall address my comment to the Visitors Gallery. The visitors have seen an example of why we should have more women in politics.
Comment on this
I did not mention the fact that Senator Kelly was not here this morning.
Comment on this
The ruling is quite clear that it is not in order to refer to the absence of a Senator.
Comment on this
Maybe I am being unfair on the Acting Chairman, because it was the Cathaoirleach who was in the Chair when all of this happened. I will raise the matter with him on another day.