Order of Business amendment ruling
The Chair rules that Senator Walsh’s amendment falls because it was not seconded; Walsh objects that he was prevented from securing a seconder, but the Order of Business is put to the House.
Senator Jim Walsh proposed an amendment to the Order of Business. If it was not seconded, it obviously falls-----
Comment on this
On a point of order, before the Leas-Chathaoirleach rules it out on that basis-----
Comment on this
My point of order is that all Members should be entitled to have the same opportunities. I have somebody who is prepared to second the amendment formally, but because I was the last speaker, it is impossible for me to have a seconder.
Comment on this
I had called Senator Paul Bradford as the last speaker but then Senator Catherine Noone indicated that she wanted to speak. It troubles me that Senators decide to come in willy-nilly towards the end of the Order of Business and want to speak. To be courteous I allowed Senator Jim Walsh in. I understand his predicament, but as there was nobody here to second the amendment, it falls. The Senator cannot take a stance on the Order of Business.
Comment on this
I never come into the House willy-nilly.
Comment on this
I was watching proceedings on the monitor and timed my arrival in order that I could, in fact-----
Comment on this
The Senator's timing was very subtle; only for Senator Paul Bradford indicating, the Leader would have responded ten minutes earlier. Is the Order of Business agreed to?
Comment on this
Is the Leas-Chathaoirleach not accepting my amendment?
Comment on this
Question put: "That the Order of Business be agreed to."
Do you agree with this result?