Bank veto in personal insolvency
Senators debate removing banks’ veto over personal insolvency arrangements, mortgage arrears and interest rates, with calls for independent oversight and Government action. The Leader defends measures addressing arrears, while Senator O’Brien presses for a Finance Minister debate.
Senator Darragh O'Brien has made a great play for the removal of the banks' veto in the personal insolvency process, and he is right to do so. We know the banks shovelled out money very irresponsibly to people during the boom years. In the case of mortgages, loans of 90% or more of the value of the property were given. The cost to the banks of borrowing money is approximately 1.5% at most, and the EU average on loans is 2.09%. I will be making a case later for the involvement of the Credit Review Office in order to introduce an element of independent overview to the issue of setting interest rates. There is a good case to be made for setting a maximum rate of 2.5% or so for non-tracker customers. The level of defaults is huge and the banks, in their own view and in the interest of the taxpayer and so on, have chosen to issue repossession orders in an effort to get customers to engage. In many cases, judges have taken a very different and more independent view in these matters, for which we can be very thankful. I hope to see more engagement by the banks with their customers. I am not arguing for the large-scale writing off of debt. The reality, of course, is that very little, if anything, has been written off on residential mortgages compared with development loans and so on.
I am not making an argument-----
Comment on this
I do not want to go down that route. The Senator mentioned bank managers.
Comment on this
Bank managers know very little and some of them have very little influence.
Comment on this
Look at the three amendments I tabled.
Comment on this
Decisions are made at a much higher level.
Comment on this
They know how business is done.
Comment on this
We will hear Mr. Duffy later today when he attends the Joint Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform.
Comment on this
I want to hear what the Minister has to say. I do not care what Mr. Duffy says.
Comment on this
I know. That is government. I ask the Senator to hold on. We have to consult and show independence in this matter.
Comment on this
The Government should do something about it, not just sit on its hands.
Comment on this
I certainly will do something about the matter. I will make a proposal when I get an opportunity at the finance committee later to question Mr. Duffy.