We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Abortion debate and historical commemoration

Summary

Senators debate abortion, the Eighth Amendment and RTÉ’s alleged imbalance, alongside a dispute about the availability of portraits of historical figures in the National Museum.

I support Senator Jim Walsh's call for a debate on abortion and the eighth amendment and the lack of balance by the national broadcaster. We should have a balanced debate on what is a very emotive issue. There are contrary views to that of mine and Senator Jim Walsh and many others on all sides of this House, but we should have that debate. There is, in my opinion, a certain amount of conditioning going on and it is conditioning in one way, so far as I can see. It is trying to cleanse the whole process of what abortion is about, that is, the ending of an unborn child's life. I call on the Leader to arrange for that debate.

I received a text from somebody who visited Collins Barracks, the National Museum of Ireland, yesterday. In the text the individual said he enjoyed the visit. At the end of the visit he bought portraits of six of the signatories of the Proclamation but it had run out of portraits of James Connolly. To illustrate the balanced approach of this individual, he also bought a portrait of Michael Collins and of James Larkin. However, when he attempted to purchase a portrait of Éamon de Valera he was told, "Oh, we don't do that". Why is the National Museum of Ireland not printing a portrait of one of the main figures of the 1916 Rising?

Comment on this
Paddy Burke An Cathaoirleach Fine Gael

That is a matter for the National Museum of Ireland.

Comment on this

It is a matter for this House.

Comment on this
David P.B. Norris Senator David Norris Independent

He was having a nervous breakdown in Bolands Mills.

Comment on this

I ask the Leader to inquire, through his good offices, why that is not happening or is this more of the Government's attempt to rewrite the history of the country?

Comment on this

The party of which the Senator is a member has rewritten the history of its party well enough.

Comment on this

The history of the Senator's former party. Before he jumped-----

Comment on this

It is a fact. Is the Senator denying it?

Comment on this

No, I am ashamed of it.

Comment on this

I thank the Senator.

Comment on this