We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Dublin transport infrastructure

Summary

Senators Reilly and Norris call for urgent discussion of Dublin’s worsening traffic, transport connectivity and infrastructure choices, including DART Underground and the metro.

I welcome the commitment of the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport to both the DART underground and the metro. The increasing traffic in Dublin and other urban areas is a real sign of our economic recovery - a recovery that we want spread to every household. As I mentioned the other day when discussing Brexit on the Order of Business, the issue is a great challenge, but there are opportunities. It makes connectivity from Dublin airport into town all the more important. One study showed an increase of 40,000 per annum in the number of cars coming into the city in the coming years. There is a wonderful opportunity to avoid all that if metro proceeds expeditiously. The Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Deputy Paschal Donohoe, was mentioned. As the previous Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport he gave a commitment that work on metro would commence by 2021. I can understand the Senator's sense of urgency around both of these big projects - they are massive - but they have to be done properly. There are procurement orders, planning issues and many other logistical and legal issues to be resolved. Much of the work has been done but a new order had to be achieved to take the new route and to reduce the cost. I believe this is a critical piece of infrastructure, particularly given Dublin Airport's plans to provide accommodation for businesses that want to locate here. It had one building and refurbished one floor, but ESB International came along and took the entire building. There is huge demand and appetite for developments in this area. Fingal County Council has the largest green area in the city, with plenty of land rezoned to afford opportunity for further development. We have the youngest population in the country, if not in the EU. We also have a very diverse population, as evidenced by Loreto Convent when it won the Young Scientist exhibition and the young ladies who achieved such great acclaim and achievement in doing that.

The metro is hugely important. I do not have a problem with keeping the project alive rather than developing it aggressively when there is very little money available. However, we have more money now, so that situation should not pertain. When I was at Cabinet I fought to keep it alive because it was in danger of being taken off the table entirely. I am pleased that it is still there and I am very pleased the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport saw fit to mention it.

I will finish by speaking on the matter of procurement. We brought in new systems which have been of great advantage to the taxpayer but we have to be careful not use them in such a blunt way that we put out of business many smaller suppliers and retailers of books in the SME area.

Comment on this
David P.B. Norris Senator David Norris Independent

I agree with Senator Catherine Ardagh and Senator James Reilly that there is an urgent need to discuss the question of traffic in the city of Dublin. Unfortunately, the city authorities, for many years, have used the infrastructure of the city as a weapon against the motor car. I think that is rather dangerous. In particular, it introduced traffic hazards that make driving dangerous, extended footpaths unnecessarily and put rows of spikes sticking up out of the ground. It is quite dangerous. What used to be three lanes has now become a cycle lane, a bus lane and one lane for traffic, and that one lane is constantly invaded by public transport.

People living in the city are not allowed to have cars under these traffic regulations and we have a situation where the planning department is deliberately limiting the number of car parking spaces in new developments of flats. I strongly support the metro and have done so for many years in this House. Unfortunately, it was dumped through a lack of nerve but it is the only way to resolve the traffic problems.

I raise the issue of the gardaí, which was raised by Senator Terry Leyden. I also met them outside. Of the Garda stations the Government is considering reopening, I sincerely hope it reopens Fitzgibbon Street Garda station which is right bang in the centre of the biggest drug area in the country. It was closed and I was lied to in this House about it. I was told it was closed for refurbishment but it was not closed for refurbishment; it was closed, full stop. The gardaí are not terribly pleased about it either. I ask that Fitzgibbon Street Garda station be put on the list to be reopened as a matter of urgency.

The gardaí are excellent but are badly treated. Their pay was to be reviewed under the Haddington Road agreement but this has been consistently stymied by the Department of Finance. There is no working mechanism for industrial relations within the Garda. Its members' pay has been reduced time and again and has never been restored. New recruits are denied rent allowances, there are fewer gardaí with more tasks required and they are subjected to increasingly violent assaults. I strongly support the gardaí. It is dreadful to have a situation where they are paid so little. If one compares that to what the Luas tram drivers get, one sees there is a lack of real understanding of comparative need and respect in society. We should have respect for our Garda force, which does a really terrific job.

Comment on this