We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Cattle slaughter rationale

Summary

Senator Paul Coghlan says the five cattle were reportedly destroyed because of disease and food-chain risks, not repossession, and agrees that the Minister should clarify the facts.

It seems strange that five cattle had to be destroyed in the manner they were. However, contrary to what Senator Trevor Ó Clochartaigh stated, it was to prevent these cattle from entering the food chain; it had nothing to do with repossession. We all have our views on repossessions. Repossession should obviously only be used be a last resort when all other avenues have been explored. In this case, I understand the animals were destroyed because they had TB or some other related disease and meat from then had to be prevented from entering the food chain. Therefore it was a public health matter, regardless of who made the decision. Let us not jump to conclusions.

Comment on this

Let us ask the Minister to clarify.

Comment on this

Exactly. We will hear the Leader respond in due course.

Comment on this