We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

First-time buyer housing tax rebate

Summary

Senator Davitt criticised the shifting housing policy on a tax rebate for first-time buyers and cited an IPAV survey showing the dominance of the second-hand housing market.

One of our other Senators hit on the following. In his budget proposals the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government, Deputy Simon Coveney, got his lines badly wrong as I suggested at the time. He is now reconsidering and redrawing his plans for a tax rebate for first-time buyers. He is on shifting ground. After meeting him this morning, the IPAV released an in-depth survey of the housing market. There are two figures which jump out at me. The first is that over 92% of homes in the State are second-hand homes. It is not a shocking statistic in that there are not too many new homes being built. The second figure is that 90% of house sale completions for first-time buyers are in the €100,000 to €350,000 range. The budgetary instruments are devised to stimulate the building industry, but they are ill-judged and will only end in failure. One more year will be wasted in house building and house starts. The core problem is the cost of building. As has been outlined many times, the cost of building has increased by 50% in the past few years owing to regulation, new engineering requirements, dezoning and a plethora of other reasons. All new homes must be A-rated, which is a great jump forward in the standard of homes we are to produce, but the cost has been passed directly to the builder. There is no extra benefit for the builder in meeting that requirement. Until we tackle the core cost of building with a lower VAT rate, this problem is not going to disappear. If the Minister was to introduce a lower VAT rate, it would certainly be tax efficient. The reduced VAT rate in the hotel industry has led to a tourism boom. A reduced tax rate of 9% on goods and services on homes being built would immediately address the housing crisis, boost the State's tax coffers and increase employment. That is going to be the answer and we will have to look at it. We are tinkering around and failing to increase supply. The core issue, as I said, is the cost of building.

Comment on this