We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Zero-hour contracts and jobs

Summary

Senator Nash called for legislation on zero-hour and low-hour contracts, while Senator Burke welcomed job growth and argued employers would need to adapt.

Ged Nash Senator Gerald Nash Labour Party

When will this or the Lower House see Government legislation regulating the use of zero-hour, if-and-when, and low-hour contracts? We can all be gratified and satisfied that, through the work of the previous Government and the continuing work of elements of this Government, there are now 2 million people in work across the economy. That is a record. The unemployment rate has decreased by 40,000 in the past year. It is fair to say that approximately 90% of all of the new jobs created during the term of the previous Government were full-time jobs.

The difficulty is that the traditional employment relationship, the standard model with which we are all familiar, is fraying at the edges. Unfortunately, many labour market practices are operating at the edge of what employment law permits. I introduced the uncertain hours Bill to the House in recent months so as to provide legislation and regulation for people who were on insecure contracts and, because they were going to bed on a Sunday night not knowing how much they would earn that week, unable to plan their lives. This is not the type of society that Senators wish to preside over or encourage.

A year and a half ago when I was Minister of State at the Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, we published the UL study of the prevalence of zero-hour and low-hour contracts in the State. It contained a series of recommendations that we proposed the Government adopt to regulate this area better, but there has been no product from the Minister who has no interest in regulating the labour market or the quality of jobs. She is interested in the quantity of jobs but not their quality, which is a huge challenge. When can we expect the long-awaited legislation from the Department to be before the Dáil or this House? Perhaps there is a message in the Fine Gael WhatsApp group and the Leader will inform the House of the status of the proposed legislation because I cannot locate it.

Comment on this

We should congratulate the Taoiseach and all of his Ministers on the jobs outturn published earlier. A total of 65,000 additional jobs were created in the past 12 months. The target set in 2012 was to have 100,000 additional people at work by 2016, but a total of 200,000 new jobs has been achieved in a short period. The State has not relied on the construction industry which is expanding to create these jobs. Senator Gerald Nash raised the issue of zero-hour contracts. Employers will have to change what they are offering in the not too distant future because the unemployment rate will reduce to 5% or even 4.5% in a short timeframe and they will have to compete for employees. That is when the Senator will see a response to that issue. The work being done on the job creation programme by all State agencies needs to be acknowledged, whether it be IDA Ireland, Enterprise Ireland or Tourism Ireland. Everyone has done a tremendous job because good leadership has been provided.

Senator Catherine Ardagh raised the housing issue. We set a clear target. We had to make sure jobs were created in order that income could be generated to provide services. The building of houses can now take off because funding will be available. Likewise, we will be able to respond to requirements in the health service because there will be access to funding. That is the key achievement of this and the previous Government.

Comment on this