We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Seanad reform and chamber renewal

Summary

Senator O'Sullivan calls for meaningful Seanad reform and broader democratic legitimacy, while Senators Norris and Coghlan make brief interjections on the new Chamber and acoustics.

It is a pleasure to be back in the House after a busy and productive recess. I add my voice to those of fellow Senators on the transformation of the Chamber. I say well done to all involved and I thank the National Museum for hosting us. However, I echo another sentiment aired yesterday by Senators Alice-Mary Higgins and McDowell. This day next week will be the fourth anniversary of the referendum on the abolition of the Seanad. My party and I opposed that abolition and the referendum was defeated by Irish citizens who looked to the Government to provide meaningful reform of this institution, whether it wished to do so or not. Since then, a Seanad reform Bill was introduced and passed Second Stage almost immediately, followed by a Government commitment to convene a committee on Seanad reform. Nothing has since been done. In spite of numerous calls for it to meet, the committee has not been convened, the Seanad Reform Bill has not been advanced to the next Stage and-----

Comment on this
David P.B. Norris Senator David Norris Independent

Very defective.

Comment on this

The Senator is right.

Comment on this

-----there is continued resentment of the Seanad's lack of democratic input. The old Seanad Chamber might be undergoing renewal but there is absolutely no sign of a similar renewal for this institution. Senator McDowell's Seanad reform Bill which I was proud to co-sign would invigorate future Seanaid by giving them the democratic mandate and expertise the institution was always meant to embody. It would guarantee one person, one vote for the election of the majority of Senators and thus end the injustice of some people having as many as seven votes while the majority have none. It would ensure the Chamber would be made up of real experts in their fields and provide a clear line of difference between this House and the Lower House and would give representation to the thousands of Irish abroad who are denied representation in either their new or original homes, in contravention of international democratic norms.

I ask the Leader for clarification on several points regarding this issue. When will the Government convene the committee on Seanad reform? What will its remit be? What will be the timeline for its work? How will it be resourced? Who will be the Chair of the committee? Will the Government agree to engage with the committee in the spirit of reform and constructive engagement engendered by the result of the referendum four years ago? Will the Government specifically focus on the Seanad reform Bill that remains on the Order Paper or a wider remit? Is it the Government's intention to slow the process yet again and wait it out until the next election and the convening of yet another report to tell us what we already know? I ask the Leader to indicate which Minister is responsible for the Bill and if that Minister will come before this House as soon as possible to tell Senators of the process?

Comment on this