Children and human rights controversy
The Leader warns against tangential commentary and insists the issue is constitutional, not personal, while Senator Mullen argues the Minister's views on children and human rights are serious and inappropriate. The exchange continues with the Leader defending the Minister and Mullen condemning her stance.
I did not interrupt the Senator and I accept his right to make the comment but we should not go down the road of tangential commentary. This is a very sensitive matter-----
Comment on this
I am entitled to my view. Let us have that debate in a respectful manner. I would be very happy to have the debate because it is one we need to have in a respectful and tolerant manner.
Comment on this
Is the Leader promising a debate on that because I raised an important point about the inappropriateness of a member of the Executive having those views given that she is responsible for children? It is a simple point.
Comment on this
The Senator is doing it again. He did it in the past and is trying to do it again. I ask him not to do it.
Comment on this
That is just a rhetorical device. It is a serious point about human rights and human dignity.
Comment on this
I am too. This is about an issue - a constitutional matter - not about a personal view of a Minister or an individual Member of any House of the Oireachtas.
Comment on this
The Minister has very radical views.
Comment on this
The Minister is entitled to her opinion.
Comment on this
It has not impacted on her doing her work. She is a very fine Minister.
Comment on this
In other ways, yes, but in this way, sadly, it is a disgrace.