We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Children with complex medical needs motion

Summary

Senator Devine proposed taking Sinn Féin motion No. 12 on children with complex medical needs without debate, but the Cathaoirleach ruled it out for insufficient notice. Devine protested, members intervened, and she said she would resubmit the motion next Tuesday.

I propose to amend the Order of Business to include motion No. 12 on the Order Paper, submitted by the Sinn Féin group, without debate. It is about children with serious and complex medical needs and the community participation in primary care that is vital. It is widely accepted best practice that service users should be involved at every stage of service development and implementation. A national steering group is being set up to decide on policy for children with complex medical needs but there is no representative of the parents' voice on that group. It is disappointing and bizarre. It is a ridiculous stance on the part of the HSE. I am proposing this amendment to the Order of Business because of the urgency of the matter. I believe the group will be established in the next few days and we might as well pack up and go home if parents are not included in it. They are the experts. They care for their children and have their best interests at heart. That is true of the other people in the group but we need the ethos of community participation, which is well established in our systems and particularly our health system. We must empower parents in the best interests of their children.

Comment on this
Denis O'Donovan An Cathaoirleach Fianna Fáil

It has been brought to my attention that the proposed amendment to the Order of Business was sent to the office around lunchtime on Monday. The rules for motions such as the one proposed by Senator Devine are that four days' notice must be given, which means it should have been submitted last Thursday. I was not asked to insert it and I have limited discretion. I have decided that I cannot allow the motion because of the abridged time. It has not been on the weekly Order Paper. The other reality is that probably two thirds of the Members are not aware of this, so I must rule against the Senator in that regard. I realise it is important to her but it is not of such urgency that one can decide otherwise. I try to be fair in facilitating Senators but the four days' notice is a precedent that is long established for good reasons. It is not a case of it being an hour or two out, but two full days. It should have been submitted last Thursday before 11 a.m. With regret, I must rule against the proposed amendment.

Comment on this

Can I respond?

Comment on this
Denis O'Donovan An Cathaoirleach Fianna Fáil

Very briefly. I do not wish to debate it.

Comment on this

It is an extreme disappointment for all those parents and carers who are listening. I understand the procedures of getting-----

Comment on this

That is not fair.

Comment on this

She is being unfair to the Cathaoirleach.

Comment on this

I am not being unfair to the Cathaoirleach. That is for him to decide.

Comment on this

Let the Senator finish her comments. I am sure she will accept the decision.

Comment on this
Denis O'Donovan An Cathaoirleach Fianna Fáil

Make your point briefly.

Comment on this

I am very disappointed for carers and parents in particular. Procedure has got in the way of passing this motion. I put it on the Order Paper in consideration of its urgency. This does not give succour to those children, parents and carers. However, I will resubmit it on the Order Paper for next Tuesday. Incidentally, it is fewer than two thirds of Senators who were not aware of it.

Comment on this
Denis O'Donovan An Cathaoirleach Fianna Fáil

I made my ruling with regret. The next speaker is Senator Maria Byrne.

Comment on this