ESRI budget analysis dispute
Conway-Walsh challenged the Leader’s reading of the ESRI report, saying its impact on low-income households was the issue. The Leader defended the budget comparison method, attacked Sinn Féin’s costing as ‘voodoo economics,’ and the exchange became increasingly argumentative.
I half understood what Senator Conway-Walsh said about income levels. I do not want to misquote her. Was she speaking about an ESRI report?
Comment on this
I referred to the analysis in yesterday's ESRI report. It is not Sinn Féin's analysis.
Comment on this
No, it is not but it is Sinn Féin's interpretation of the analysis that I want to address.
Comment on this
It is black and white. I have read it all.
Comment on this
First, the ESRI assessment is done by comparing the budget against a hypothetical wage-indexed budget. Second, the ESRI results show that social welfare increases have happened, pay restoration has begun and the amount of income in people's pockets has increased. In the aftermath of the budget, the ESRI publicly acknowledged that the full indexation of the budget to wage growth would cost more than the resources available for the budget. I know the Senator has a-----
Comment on this
The Leader is missing the point.
Comment on this
It is the impact they were-----
Comment on this
-----wants voodoo economics to come back.
Comment on this
To be fair to her, she has consistently asked the Government to spend billions of euro beyond what the Government has.
Comment on this
They have been costed by the Department of Finance.
Comment on this
It is Sinn Féin's voodoo economics.