We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Seanad
‹ Order of Business

Opposition to Judicial Appointments Bill

Summary

Senator Craughwell continued his attack on the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, saying it was important but seriously flawed and should be deferred until January. Senator Conway-Walsh indicated support for the amendment, though not as seconder.

If I may, the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill is extremely important, albeit severely flawed, and I am totally opposed to it.

Comment on this

That is why it is important that we pass the Bill.

Comment on this

I think the Leader will agree that nobody is stopping the traffic on Kildare Street and demanding that this Bill is pushed through the House. Not even the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport is out screaming that it be passed today.

Comment on this

He is in Stepaside, at the Garda station.

Comment on this

I ask that this Bill be deferred until January in order that we might devote sufficient time to it. There has been an extensive amount of debate on the Bill.

Comment on this

We call it filibustering.

Comment on this

The Leader may call it that.

Comment on this

Everybody wants to be nice, today. The Leader should calm down.

Comment on this

I would call it scrutinising the legislation, which is what we are paid to do. I ask that the Bill be withdrawn from the Order of Business. I hope I will have a seconder and support. I thank the Leas-Cathaoirleach for his time and for even-handed management of this morning's sitting.

Comment on this

We will support that amendment to the-----

Comment on this
Paul Coghlan An Leas-Chathaoirleach Fine Gael

Is the Senator seconding it?

Comment on this

No, I am supporting the amendment to the Order of Business.

Comment on this