Order of Business amendment dispute
The vote on the amended Order of Business exposed a further disagreement over whether the Leader would back Norris’s proposal tomorrow. The Leader offered to talk to members and try to secure a Minister, and Norris eventually said he would accept the proposal.
It is most unusual, in a vote like this, to defer an item to a later time in the evening. I have never known it done.
Comment on this
I am sorry, I just want to finish this. When this proposal came from the bench, I remember wondering why the debate was to be after No. 2. I thought it must have been because something was going through without a vote. I am going to check the record to see what happened here.
Comment on this
It is a matter for me to clarify. Senator Norris has posed a question. My understanding is clearly that our very esteemed and learned Clerk believes that what was put is exactly what the Senator proposed.
Comment on this
It may not have been what the Senator intended, but the Clerk is quite clear on it. We cannot undo what is done.
Comment on this
No. To be helpful, and to be fair to Senator Norris, while I do not want to aggravate the situation, it is still the case that the Minister is not available. What Senator Norris proposed was to be after No. 2. I am prepared to have the debate without the Minister tomorrow. I am also prepared to allow for debate on the motion subject to the availability of a Minister, if the House will agree to that.
Comment on this
I am quite prepared to be moderate on this issue. Will the Leader give me an undertaking that he will at least attempt to find a Minister for tomorrow?
Comment on this
I will talk to the Members and to Senator Norris and I will do my best, but I cannot give a guarantee now.
Comment on this
I will do my best but I cannot guarantee anything. I have offered the Senator the option of having the debate without a Minister tomorrow.