Senator Leyden has proposed an amendment, "That No. 3 not be taken today and that a debate with the Minister for Finance and Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform on the consequences for the capital investment plan of the cost overrun at the national children's hospital be taken in its stead." The amendment has been seconded. Is it being pressed?

Very much so because we have-----

The Senator does not have to elaborate. Is it being pressed?

It is-----

Senator you have had your say. I have asked you if the amendment is being pressed.

I want to explain why.

I do not need your explanation.

You do not seem to understand, a Leas-Chathaoirligh.

Some of our colleagues seem confused as to how they were voting. This proposal was to bring the Minister for Finance to the House to discuss where the cutbacks are going to be made to public projects as a result of the overrun on the children's hospital. To facilitate them, under Standing Order 62(3)(b) I request that the division be taken again other than by electronic means.

Is the Order of Business agreed?

No. I want the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill 2017 to be taken before discussion on cutbacks.

The Senator should resume his seat. If Members want to have a conversation they can have it outside the Chamber.

As a teller, to make sure everyone understands what they are doing, some people may have been confused and others not here who were here earlier, but under Standing Order 62(3)(b) I request that the division be taken again other than by electronic means.