Judicial Appointments Bill timing
Senator Horkan opposed changing the order of business, arguing it was inconsistent for those who had spent hundreds of hours opposing the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill to now want it rushed. The argument continued with interruptions, but his basic point was that the proposed timetable was not credible.
The debate on last year's Finance Bill was relatively short. I will be opposing the amendment to the Order of Business. I find it slightly hard to take that a group which has spent 100 hours plus opposing the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill is now in a rush to have a debate on it and to have that debate taken before debates on other matters.
Comment on this
Senators are asking that it be rushed into the Chamber despite that they spent over 100 hours opposing it.
Comment on this
I know exactly what I am talking about.
Comment on this
Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael should stop kidding themselves and co-operating with each other.
Comment on this
I am making the point, validly, that the people who are proposing the amendment to the Order of Business to rush the Judicial Appointments Commission Bill into the House at 4.45 p.m. are the same individuals who have spent hundreds of hours and approximately a year and a half opposing it. That is fine. I have opposed the Bill too. I have no problem with them opposing the Bill, but I find it slightly hard to take that they want to rush it in now when they have been opposing it up to now.