We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Special Committee Corporation Tax Bill, 1975

SECTION 94.

Bill Corporation Tax Bill, 1975
Enacted

No. 37 of 1975 ›

This section is concerned with the definition of a "close company". Broadly speaking, a close company is a company which is under the control of five or fewer participators or of its participators who are directors, however many such directors there may be. A non-resident company, an industrial and provident society, most building societies, a company controlled by the State and a company controlled by a non-close company will not be regarded as a close company.

Comment on this

This is something new?

Comment on this

The existing section in the Income Tax Act is 530. Part X of this Bill is more extensive. It clears up some areas of uncertainty.

Comment on this

This is an attack on accumulated profits, non-distributed profits?

Comment on this

Yes. Both the 1972 and the 1974 White Papers recommended that section 530 should be strengthened.

Comment on this

I take it that this is directed at tax avoidance.

Comment on this

Yes. We have not received any representations on it.

Comment on this

Does this relate to profits accumulated and not invested?

Comment on this

That is a way in which a close company has been used in the past.

Comment on this

The Minister is including in section 94 registered industrial and provident societies and building societies but not agricultural societies.

Comment on this

An agricultural society is not separately mentioned but an industrial and provident society could be an agricultural society.

Comment on this

Yes, but there is a provision somewhere. At one time certain concessions to industrial and provident societies were withdrawn because the industrial and provident societies were being used by builders as a way of escape and the concessions were withdrawn. At the time the concessions were withdrawn exemption in respect of withdrawal was made in the case of agricultural societies, if the societies were engaged in agriculture and had so many members.

Comment on this

They would be excluded if they had the numbers to make up a close company—five or fewer participators.

Comment on this

I am not sure where this takes us. Section 220 of the Income Tax Act, 1967, defines an agricultural society for the purposes of that Act.

Comment on this

That is how it came in.

Comment on this

It says that an agricultural society means a society in relation to which the following conditions are satisfied: that the number of the society's members is not less than 50; that all or a majority of the society's members are persons who are mainly engaged in and derive the principal part of their income from husbandry and that it is a society to which a certificate under subsection (2) (a) has been issued. That incorporates section 70 of the 1963 Act which provides for disregarding the profits or losses applicable to certain transactions.

Comment on this

It was to identify a bona fide agricultural co-operative society and to leave it untouched by the withdrawal of concessions at that time?

Comment on this

Yes.

Comment on this

Where do they stand now?

Comment on this

These agricultural societies are relieved under the industrial and provident societies part of the Bill.

Comment on this

So they are still regarded as industrial or provident societies and they do not have to be specified as agricultural and so these close companies provisions will not apply to them?

Comment on this

That is right.

Comment on this

No. Their members would exclude them.

Comment on this

An agriculture society must be a society registered under the Industrial and Provident Societies Acts, 1893 to 1936.

Comment on this