We use Google Analytics to see which pages are read and how the site is used, so we know what to improve. This only runs if you accept. See our privacy notice for details.

Dáil

SECRETARIES TO DELEGATION

proposed Mr. Childers, Mr. H. Boland and Mr. K. O'Higgins be appointed secretaries.

Comment on this

said he would like to mention that one of the secretaries should have a knowledge of Irish. Lloyd George often reminded them they were not an Irish speaking nation. He had no objection to the three names suggested. He did not want to be accused of holding up the programme but he urged the appointment of P. Béaslaí.

Comment on this

agreed with Mr. Walsh that someone with a knowledge of Irish should be chosen. It would be a matter of considerable personal inconvenience to himself if he had to go.

Comment on this

accepted the suggestion that one of the secretaries should have a knowledge of Irish.

Comment on this

proposed that Mr. Childers and Mr. Boland be nominated as secretaries.

Comment on this

said it was not necessary to have the secretaries ratified by the Dáil at all. He suggested that their appointment be left to the Ministry.

Comment on this

said he would withdraw his motion and ask the Dáil to leave it to the Ministry to appoint secretaries.

Comment on this
SPEAKER

said this was hardly necessary. It would be taken as a matter of course.

Comment on this
Séamus Robinson S. ROBINSON

said there was no representative of the Army on the delegation. Did the Cabinet consider the advisability of having the Minister for Defence on the delegation?

Comment on this
MINISTER FOR DEFENCE

said there was no necessity for him to go. He had more useful work to do in Ireland at the present time. The representatives whom they were sending were bound by the replies already given.

Comment on this

said they could expect from developments there would be a campaign against them on account of the second paragraph of the reply and an attempt to get at our own people and make it appear they were asking for recognition of the Republic as a precedent for entering the conference.

In order to meet that properly it would be necessary for them to show they were in earnest and that it was a letter with a purpose and to show the sincerity of their purpose they should publish at once that plenipotentiaries had been appointed as follows. He thought that should be published to-morrow at the same time with the announcement that the Dáil had considered and confirmed the reply sent to Lloyd George.

Comment on this

suggested it would be better to publish a statement this evening.

Comment on this

said the Director of Publicity had a communication ready to give to the Press which was as follows:

"PEACE CONFERENCE

Dáil Éireann met in private session in the Mansion House at 11 a.m.

The Cabinet reply to Mr. Lloyd George was read and unanimously adopted.

In view of a possible conference with Representatives of the British Government, the following Plenipotentiaries were unanimously ratified:

Mr. Arthur Griffith, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Chairman.

Mr. Michael Collins, Minister of Finance.

Commandant R.C. Barton, Minister of Economic Affairs.

Mr. E.J. Duggan, representative of Meath and Louth.

Mr. George Gavan Duffy, Irish Envoy at Rome, representative of Dublin County.

The Private Session ended at 2.30."

Comment on this

asked if the Director of Publicity could have an understanding with the two nationalist papers not to allow the correspondence columns to be open to defeatist letters.

Comment on this
Mary MacSwiney MISS MACSWINEY Sinn Féin

said some representation should be made to the papers on the point of how they referred to the enemy government. They never used the word "President" before the name of de Valera and they referred to their Cabinet as "Irish Leaders".

Comment on this

said he had already made representations. It was a difficult thing to do; they did not want to muzzle the Press but to give it as much liberty as they possibly could without interfering. He realized the harm they were doing and it was very difficult to make themselves realize it. Public discussion would be forced upon them about those issues and they could not muzzle the public in those matters. If they attempted to do it there would be a rising tide that would sweep the barrier. It was better to let the water trickle through.

Comment on this

asked could not the correspondence be published in Irish as well as in English.

Comment on this

said that could be done.

Comment on this

asked why not compel them to give equal freedom to both sides.

Comment on this

said as far as he knew there was perfect freedom on both sides now.

Comment on this