Ministerial intervention in Kerry strike
The Deputy accused the Minister of making no serious effort to resolve or prevent the Killarney strike and urged personal intervention. The Minister said his Department did not intervene in every dispute, but would assess the latest report and consider constructive action if no solution had been reached.
Is it not a fact that the Minister is making no serious effort to have the dispute in Killarney resolved to the satisfaction of all concerned, and would he not intervene personally with a view to resolving the situation at an early date?
Comment on this
The Deputy seems so shocked by my remarks today that I do not see what use I would be in Killarney or anywhere else if I were to take his views. However, while I am not aware of the up-to-date position in relation to the meeting which took place in Killarney this morning, no doubt the civil servants in my Department are aware, and when I am back in my Department this afternoon having finished the legislation in the House, I will be informed what has happened in Killarney this morning. Based on that report, we can see what constructively can be done if no solution has been reached at the meeting this morning.
Comment on this
Would the Minister say what went wrong with the early warning system within his Department in view of the fact that his Department did not intervene to prevent the strike in Killarney from taking place? He appears to have made no effort to prevent this strike which was pending for a considerable period prior to the date this action took place.
Comment on this
I do not think it would be helpful nor would most employers' organisations or unions consider it helpful that my Department should intervene in every dispute wherever it occurs in the country. There are always discussions and negotiations going on and disputes breaking out. The Department of Labour intervene only when no solution is reached by the Labour Court or other agencies more appropriately working for solutions in this area.